Back

The association of CREBRF variant rs373863828 with body composition in adult Samoans

Nicola L. Hawley; Rachel L. Duckham; Jenna C. Carlson; Take Naseri; Muagututia Sefuiva Reupena; Viali Lameko; Alysa Pomer; Abigail Wetzel; Melania Selu; Vaimoana Lupematisila; Folla Unasa; Lupesina Vesi; Tracy Fatu; Seipepa Unasa; Kima Faasalele-Savusa; Satupaitea Viali; Anna C. Rivara; Emily M. Russell; Ranjan Deka; Erin E. Kershaw; Ryan L. Minster; Daniel E. Weeks; Stephen T. McGarvey

2021-02-12 epidemiology
10.1101/2021.02.11.21251582 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: The minor allele of rs373863828, a missense variant in CREBRF, is associated with higher BMI but lower odds of type 2 diabetes in Pacific Islanders. Methods: To test if this protective effect operates through metabolically favorable body fat distribution, we examined the association of the minor A allele with body composition, measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), in a cross-sectional study of n=421 Samoan adults. Results: We replicated our earlier finding that this allele was associated with higher weight and BMI, although it was statistically significant only in women. There was no significant association of genotype with percent body fat, visceral adiposity or fat distribution, although in women, the A allele was associated with greater total fat mass (p=0.02), android (p=0.009) and trunk fat (p=0.01). In both sexes, age- and height-adjusted average lean mass was significantly greater per copy of the A allele: 2.16 kg/copy in women and 1.73 kg/copy in men. Conclusions: These data do not support a primary role of fat distribution in mediating the association between rs373863828 genotype and type 2 diabetes risk. We suggest an alternative hypothesis: those with the A allele may more efficiently regulate blood glucose because of their greater absolute lean mass.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.