An opposing self-reinforced odor pre-exposure memory produces latent inhibition in Drosophila
Jacob, P. F.; Vargas-Gutierrez, P.; Okray, Z.; Vietti-Michelina, S.; Felsenberg, J.; Waddell, S.
Show abstract
Prior experience of a stimulus can inhibit subsequent acquisition or expression of a learned association of that stimulus. However, the neuronal manifestations of this learning effect, named latent inhibition (LI), are poorly understood. Here we show that odor pre-exposure produces LI of appetitive olfactory memory performance in Drosophila. Behavioral expression of LI requires that the context during memory testing resembles that during the odor pre-exposures. Odor pre-exposure forms an aversive memory that requires dopaminergic neurons that innervate the {gamma}2'1 and 3 mushroom body compartments - those to 3 exhibit increasing odor-driven activity with successive pre-exposures. In contrast, odor-specific responses of the corresponding mushroom body output neurons are suppressed. Odor pre-exposure therefore recruits specific dopaminergic neurons that provide teaching signals that attach negative valence to the odor itself. LI of Drosophila appetitive memory consequently results from a temporary and context-dependent retrieval deficit imposed by competition with this short-lived aversive memory.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Compromising tyrosine hydroxylase function establishes a delusion-like temporal profile of reinforcement by dopamine neurons in Drosophila 96%
- Pairing-dependent plasticity in a dissected fly brain is input-specific and requires synaptic CaMKII enrichment and nighttime sleep 96%
- Rewarding capacity of optogenetically activating a giant GABAergic central-brain interneuron in larval Drosophila 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.