Back

Testing for parallel genomic and epigenomic footprints of adaptation to urban life in a passerine bird

Caizergues, A. E.; Le Luyer, J.; Gregoire, A.; Szulkin, M.; Senar, J. C.; Charmantier, A.; Perrier, C.

2021-02-10 genomics
10.1101/2021.02.10.430452 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Identifying the molecular mechanisms involved in rapid adaptation to novel environments and determining their predictability are central questions in Evolutionary Biology and pressing issues due to rapid global changes. Complementary to genetic responses to selection, faster epigenetic variations such as modifications of DNA methylation may play a substantial role in rapid adaptation. In the context of rampant urbanization, joint examinations of genomic and epigenomic mechanisms are still lacking. Here, we investigated genomic (SNP) and epigenomic (CpG methylation) responses to urban life in a passerine bird, the Great tit (Parus major). To test whether urban evolution is predictable (i.e parallel) or involves mostly non-parallel molecular processes among cities, we analysed three distinct pairs of city and forest Great tit populations across Europe. Results reveal a polygenic response to urban life, with both many genes putatively under weak divergent selection and multiple differentially methylated regions (DMRs) between forest and city great tits. DMRs mainly overlapped transcription start sites and promotor regions, suggesting their importance in the modulation gene expression. Both genomic and epigenomic outliers were found in genomic regions enriched for genes with biological functions related to nervous system, immunity, behaviour, hormonal and stress responses. Interestingly, comparisons across the three pairs of city-forest populations suggested little parallelism in both genetic and epigenetic responses. Our results confirm, at both the genetic and epigenetic levels, hypotheses of polygenic and largely non-parallel mechanisms of rapid adaptation in new environments such as urbanized areas.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
61.4%
50% of probability mass above
2
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.2%
3
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
6
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.7%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
9
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
10
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
12
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
13
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
14
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
16
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
17
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
18
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
20
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
21
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
22
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
23
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%