Correcting excess mortality for pandemic-associated population decreases
Jeremy Samuel Faust; Chengan Du; Shu-Xia Li; Zhenqiu Lin; Harlan M. Krumholz
Show abstract
Objectives We identify a correction for excess mortality that takes the sudden unexpected changes in the size of the United States population into account. Design This is a weekly cross-sectional analysis of all-cause mortality since week 5, 2020. We describe and apply a simple correction that takes population changes into account in order to provide corrected weekly estimates of expected deaths for 2020 and 2021. Setting The United States. Participants All United States residents. Interventions The covid-19 pandemic. Main outcome measures Expected and excess mortality for the United States during the covid-19 period. Results As of week 53, 2020 (ending January 2, 2021), approximately >10,200 more excess deaths have occurred in the United States than could be detected if expected deaths projections were not amended to reflect population decreases during 2020. The figure is projected to rise to >12,600 (>600 weekly) by week 5, 2021. Assuming recent excess mortality and pandemic-associated visa reductions continue until the earliest time herd immunity could be approached resulting from a combination of infections and vaccinations (week 17, 2021), if point estimates of expected deaths are not corrected, expected deaths will be overestimated (and therefore potential excess mortality underestimated) by ~43,000 during 2021, or >53,300 since the outbreak of the pandemic measurement period (beginning week 5, 2020). By late December 2021, weekly expected death differences are projected to approach 1,000 per week. Conclusions Current models measuring excess mortality should be revised immediately so that public health officials do not lose the ability to detect ongoing excess mortality as the population changes continue to compound, lowering the number of weekly expected deaths. A similar approach should be used in the middle and late phases of all future pandemics.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The US Midlife Mortality Crisis Continues: Excess Cause-Specific Mortality During 2020 95%
- How Timing of Stay-at-home Orders and Mobility Reductions Impacted First-Wave COVID-19 Deaths in US Counties 92%
- Protection of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection is similar to that of BNT162b2 vaccine protection: A three-month nationwide experience from Israel 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Geographic and Temporal Patterns in Covid-19 Mortality by Race and Ethnicity in the United States from March 2020 to February 2022 95%
- Contributions of occupation characteristics and educational attainment to racial/ethnic inequities in COVID-19 mortality 92%
- The Joint Impact of COVID-19 Vaccination and Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions on Infections, Hospitalizations, and Mortality: An Agent-Based Simulation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Excess death among Latino people in California during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- County-Level Estimates of Excess Mortality associated with COVID-19 in the United States 94%
- The contribution of population age-sex structure to the excess mortality estimates of 2020–2021 in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measuring the missing: greater racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19 burden after accounting for missing race/ethnicity data 93%
- Estimating the cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the infection fatality ratio in light of waning antibodies 92%
- The Epidemiological Implications of Jails for Community, Corrections Officer, and Incarcerated Population Risks from COVID-19 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reductions in US life expectancy from COVID-19 by Race and Ethnicity: Is 2021 a repetition of 2020? 93%
- The Impact of Vaccination to Control COVID-19 Burden in the United States: A Simulation Modeling Approach 93%
- Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines on Covid-19 Incidence and Mortality in the United States 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.