Thresholded Partial Least Squares: Fast Construction of Interpretable Whole-brain Decoders
Lee, S.; Bradlow, E. T.; Kable, J. W.
Show abstract
Recent neuroimaging research has shown that it is possible to decode mental states and predict future consumer behavior from brain activity data (a time-series of images). However, the unique characteristics (and high dimensionality) of neuroimaging data, coupled with a need for neuroscientifically interpretable models, has largely discouraged the use of the entire brains data as predictors. Instead, most neuroscientific research uses "regionalized" (partial-brain) data to reduce the computational burden and to improve interpretability (i.e., localizability of signal), at the cost of losing potential information. Here we propose a novel approach that can build whole-brain neural decoders (using the entire data set and capitalizing on the full correlational structure) that are both interpretable and computationally efficient. We exploit analytical properties of the partial least squares algorithm to build a regularized regression model with variable selection that boasts (in contrast to most statistical methods) a unique fit-once-tune-later approach where users need to fit the model only once and can choose the best tuning parameters post-hoc. We demonstrate its efficacy in a large neuroimaging dataset against off-the-shelf prediction methods and show that our new method scales exceptionally with increasing data size, yields more interpretable results, and uses less computational memory, while retaining high predictive power.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- FEMA: Fast and efficient mixed-effects algorithm for large sample whole-brain imaging data 97%
- SAN: mitigating spatial covariance heterogeneity in cortical thickness data collected from multiple scanners or sites 97%
- Simultaneous Modeling of Reaction Times and Brain Dynamics in a Spatial Cuing Task 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.