Validating a high-throughput tracking system: ATLAS as a regional-scale alternative to GPS
Beardsworth, C. E.; Gobbens, E.; van Maarseveen, F.; Denissen, B.; Dekinga, A.; Nathan, R.; Toledo, S.; Bijleveld, A. I.
Show abstract
O_LIFine-scale tracking of animal movement is important to understand the proximate mechanisms of animal behaviour. While GPS tracking is an excellent tool for measuring animal movement, trade-offs between tag weight, cost and lifespan limit its application to relatively large species, a small number of individuals or short tracking durations, respectively. The reverse-GPS system - ATLAS - uses lighter, cheaper tags compared to GPS tags, that can also last long periods of time at high sampling frequencies. Six systems are now operational worldwide and have successfully tracked over 50 species in various landscape types. This growing use of ATLAS to track animal movement motivates further refinement of best-practice application and an assessment of its accuracy. C_LIO_LIHere, we test the accuracy and precision of the largest ATLAS system, located in the Dutch Wadden Sea using concurrent GPS measurements as a reference. This large-scale ATLAS system consists of 26 receivers and covers 1326 km2 of intertidal region, with almost no physical obstacles for radio signals, providing a useful baseline for other systems. To measure accuracy, we calculated the distance between ATLAS and GPS location estimates for a route (mobile test) and 16 fixed locations (stationary test) on the Griend mudflat. C_LIO_LIATLAS-derived location estimates differed on average 4.2 m from GPS-estimated stationary test sites and 5.7 m from GPS tracks taken whilst moving between them. Signals that were collected by more receiver stations were more accurate, although even 3-receiver localisations were comparable with GPS localisations ([~]10 m difference). Higher receiver stations detected the tag at longer distances. C_LIO_LIFuture ATLAS users should consider the height of receivers, their spatial arrangement, density and the movement mode of the study species (e.g., ground-dwelling or flying). In conclusion, ATLAS provides an accurate, regional-scale alternative to global GPS-based tracking with which hundreds of relatively small-bodied species can be tracked simultaneously for long periods of time. Our study shows that ATLAS is a valid alternative, providing comparable location estimates to GPS. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A low-cost, long-term underwater camera trap network coupled with deep residual learning image analysis 95%
- Use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for mark-resight nesting population estimation of adult female green sea turtles at Raine Island 94%
- Passive acoustic methods for tracking the 3D movements of small cetaceans around marine structures 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tracking small animals in complex landscapes: a comparison of localisation workflows for automated radio telemetry systems 94%
- Both environmental conditions and intra- and interspecific interactions influence the movements of a marine predator 92%
- How do King Cobras move across a major highway? Unintentional wildlife crossing structures may facilitate movement. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Automating the analysis of fish abundance using object detection: optimising animal ecology with deep learning 94%
- Whale shark residency and small-scale movements around oil and gas platforms in Qatar 93%
- Using cost-effective surveys from platforms of opportunity to assess cetacean occurrence patterns for marine park management in the heart of the Coral Triangle 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.