Back

Transcriptome signature of cell viability predicts drug response and drug interaction for Tuberculosis

Srinivas, V.; Ruiz, R. A.; Pan, M.; Immanuel, S. R. C.; Peterson, E. J. R.; Baliga, N. S.

2021-02-09 microbiology
10.1101/2021.02.09.430468 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The treatment of tuberculosis (TB), which kills 1.8 million each year, remains difficult, especially with the emergence of multidrug resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). While there is an urgent need for new drug regimens to treat TB, the process of drug evaluation is slow and inefficient owing to the slow growth rate of the pathogen, the complexity of performing bacteriologic assays in a high-containment facility, and the context-dependent variability in drug sensitivity of the pathogen. Here, we report the development of "DRonA" and "MLSynergy", algorithms to perform rapid drug response assays and predict response of Mtb to novel drug combinations. Using a novel transcriptome signature for cell viability, DRonA accurately detects bacterial killing by diverse mechanisms in broth culture, macrophage infection and patient sputum, providing an efficient, and more sensitive alternative to time- and resource-intensive bacteriologic assays. Further, MLSynergy builds on DRonA to predict novel synergistic and antagonistic multi-drug combinations using transcriptomes of Mtb treated with single drugs. Together DRonA and MLSynergy represent a generalizable framework for rapid monitoring of drug effects in host-relevant contexts and accelerate the discovery of efficacious high-order drug combinations.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 15%
11.8%
2
npj Antimicrobials and Resistance
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
3
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.8%
4
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.5%
5
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.8%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.0%
8
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
ACS Infectious Diseases
82 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 21%
2.4%
11
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.4%
12
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
14
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
15
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
130 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
17
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
18
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.7%
19
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
20
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
21
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
22
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.3%
23
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
24
The Lancet Microbe
44 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
25
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
26
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
27
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
28
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
29
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
30
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%