Back

Relationships between biomechanical parameters, neurological recovery, and neuropathology following concussion in swine

Wofford, K. L.; Grovola, M. R.; Adewole, D. O.; Browne, K. D.; Putt, M. E.; O'Donnell, J. C.; Cullen, D. K.

2021-02-12 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.02.09.430268 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) affects millions of individuals annually primarily through falls, traffic collisions, or blunt trauma and can generate symptoms that persist for years. Closed-head rotational injury is the most common form of mTBI and is defined by a rapid change in acceleration within an intact skull. Injury kinematics - the mechanical descriptors of injury-inducing motion - explain movement of the head, energy transfer to the brain, and, therefore, determine injury severity. However, the relationship between closed-head rotational injury kinematics - such as angular velocity, angular acceleration, and injury duration - and outcome after mTBI is currently unknown. To address this gap in knowledge, we analyzed archived surgical records of 24 swine experiencing a diffuse closed-head rotational acceleration mTBI against 12 sham animals. Kinematics were contrasted against acute recovery outcomes, specifically apnea, extubation time, standing time, and recovery duration. Compared to controls, animals with mTBI were far more likely to have apnea (p<0.001) along with shorter time to extubation (p=0.023), and longer time from extubation to recovery (p=0.006). Using regression analyses with variable selection, we generated simplified linear models relating kinematics to apnea (R2=0.27), standing time (R2=0.39) and recovery duration (R2=0.42). Neuropathology was correlated with multiple kinematics, with maximum acceleration exhibiting the strongest correlation (R2=0.66). Together, these data suggest the interplay between multiple injury kinematics, including minimum velocity and middle to minimum acceleration time, best explain acute recovery parameters and neuropathology after mTBI in swine. Future experiments that independently manipulate individual kinematics could be instrumental in developing translational diagnostics for clinical mTBI.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.