Back

Mechanistic underpinning of nonuniform collective motions in swarming bacteria

Bera, P.; Abdul, W.; Mondal, J.; Ghosh, P.

2021-02-09 biophysics
10.1101/2021.02.08.430357 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Self-propelled bacteria can exhibit a large variety of non-equilibrium self-organized phenomena. Swarming is one such fascinating dynamical scenario where a number of motile individuals grouped into clusters and move in synchronized flows and vortices. While precedent investigations in rod-like particles confirm that increased aspect-ratio promotes alignment and order, recent experimental studies in bacteria Bacillus subtilis show a non-monotonic dependence of cell-aspect ratio on their swarming motion. Here, by computer simulations of an agent-based model of selfpropelled, mechanically interacting, rod-shaped bacteria in overdamped condition, we explore the collective dynamics of bacterial swarm subjected to a variation of cell-aspect ratio. When modeled with an identical self-propulsion speed across a diverse range of cell aspect ratio, simulations demonstrate that both shorter and longer bacteria exhibit slow dynamics whereas the fastest speed is obtained at an intermediate aspect ratio. Our investigation highlights that the origin of this observed non-monotonic trend of bacterial speed and vorticity with cell-aspect ratio is rooted in the cell-size dependence of motility force. The swarming features remain robust for a wide range of surface density of the cells, whereas asymmetry in friction attributes a distinct effect. Our analysis identifies that at an intermediate aspect ratio, an optimum cell size and motility force promote alignment, which reinforces the mechanical interactions among neighboring cells leading to the overall fastest motion. Mechanistic underpinning of the collective motions reveals that it is a joint venture of the short-range repulsive and the size-dependent motility forces, which determines the characteristics of swarming.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
Soft Matter
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.3%
5
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.1%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
11
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
12
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
14
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.2%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
18
Cytoskeleton
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
23
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
25
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%