A recurrent cortical model can parsimoniously explain the effect of expectations on sensory processes
Urgen, B. M.; Boyaci, H.
Show abstract
The effects of prior knowledge, predictions, and expectations on sensory and decision-making processes have been extensively studied. Yet, the neural mechanisms underlying those effects are still unclear. Here, we propose a recurrent neuronal model and test its predictions on behavioral and neuroimaging data from the literature. The model implements predictive processing through recurrent interactions among feature-tuned neural populations that integrate feedback and feedforward signals within established cortical circuitry. Our results show that the model can successfully explain the behavioral effects of prediction found in a previous study in which houses and faces were used as stimuli. We then simulate fMRI data using the protocols of three different studies from the literature, and the optimized model parameters obtained from the model fit to the behavioral data. Although the studies used diverse visual stimuli, not limited to faces and houses, the model predicts their findings to a great extent, proving its generalizability. Overall, our findings demonstrate that the proposed model can provide a link between behavior and neural activity, offering a theoretical account of how prior knowledge, predictions, and expectations influence sensory processing.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Representing context and priority in working memory 95%
- Abstract neural representations of category membership beyond information coding stimulus or response 95%
- Large-scale functional integration, rather than functional dissociation along dorsal and ventral streams, underlies visual perception and action 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.