Bayesian modeling and simulation to inform rare disease drug development early decision-making: application to Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Lennie, J.; Mondick, J. T.; Gastonguay, M. R.
Show abstract
Rare disease clinical trials are constrained to small sample sizes and may lack placebo-control, leading to challenges in drug development. This paper proposes a Bayesian model-based framework for early go/no-go decision making in rare disease drug development, using Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) as an example. Early go/no-go decisions were based on projections of long-term functional outcomes from a Bayesian model-based analysis of short-term trial data informed by prior knowledge based on 6MWT natural history literature data in DMD patients. Frequentist hypothesis tests were also applied as a reference analysis method. A number of combinations of hypothetical trial designs, drug effects and cohort comparison methods were assessed.The proposed Bayesian model-based framework was superior to the frequentist method for making go/no-go decisions across all trial designs and cohort comparison methods in DMD. The average decision accuracy rates across all trial designs for the Bayesian and frequentist analysis methods were 45.8 and 8.98%, respectively. A decision accuracy rate of at least 50% was achieved for 42 and 7% of the trial designs under the Bayesian and frequentist analysis methods, respectively. The frequentist method was limited to the short-term trial data only, while the Bayesian methods were informed with both the short-term data and prior information. The specific results of the DMD case study were limited due to incomplete specification of individual-specific covariates in the natural history literature data and should be reevaluated using a full natural history dataset. These limitations aside, the framework presented provides a proof of concept for the utility of Bayesian model-based methods for decision making in rare disease trials.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Trials for Wolfram Syndrome Neurodegeneration: Novel Design, Endpoints, and Analysis Models 94%
- Using numerical modelling and simulation to assess the ethical burden in clinical trials and how it relates to the proportion of responders in a trial sample 94%
- Towards development of a statistical framework to evaluate myotonic dystrophy type 1 mRNA biomarkers in the context of a clinical trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A regularized functional regression model enabling transcriptome-wide dosage-dependent association study of cancer drug response 93%
- Chemotherapy-Induced Cachexia and Model-Informed Dosing to Preserve Lean Mass in Cancer Treatment 92%
- Repeated measures ASCA+ for analysis of longitudinal intervention studies with multivariate outcome data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Simulating clinical trials for model-informed precision dosing: Using warfarin treatment as a use case 91%
- A systematic review of utilisation of diurnal timing information in clinical trial design for Long QT syndrome 90%
- PBPK modelling of dexamethasone in patients with COVID-19 and liver disease 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the Efficacy of Common Treatments in Children and Young Adults Diagnosed with Cerebral Palsy Using Three Machine Learning Algorithms 92%
- Enhanced expression of Dystrophin, IGF-1, CD44 and MYH3 in plasma and skeletal muscles including Diaphragm of mdx mice after oral administration of Neu REFIX Beta 1,3-1,6 glucan 92%
- The molecular basis of the anticancer effect of statins 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Causal Forests versus Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting to adjust for Cluster-Level Confounding: A Parametric and Plasmode Simulation Study based on US Hosptial Electronic Health Record Data 91%
- Development and application of an algorithm for statin-induced myopathy based on electronic health record-derived structured elements 90%
- Bias amplification of unobserved confounding in pharmacoepidemiological studies using indication-based sampling: there is no free lunch in restricting the sample to those with a particular drug-indication 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.