Disentangling the effects of climate change, landscape heterogeneity, and scale on phenological metrics
Newman, E. A.; Breckheimer, I. K.; Park, D. S.
Show abstract
Phenology, the study of the timing of cyclical life history events and seasonal changes, is a fundamental aspect of how individual species, communities, and ecosystems will respond to climate change. Both biotic and abiotic phenological patterns are changing rapidly in response to changing seasonal temperatures and other climate-related drivers, and the consequences of these shifts for individual species and entire ecosystems are largely unknown. Landscape-scale simulations can address some of these needs for better predictions by demonstrating how phenology measures can vary with spatial and temporal grain of observations, and how phenological responses can vary with landscape heterogeneity and climate drivers. To explicitly examine the spatial and temporal scale-dependence of multiple phenology measures, we constructed simulated landscapes populated by virtual plant species with realistic phenologies and environmental sensitivities. This enabled us to examine phenology measures and environmental sensitivities along a continuum of spatial and temporal grains, while also controlling other aspects of sampling design. By relating measures of phenology calculated at a given spatiotemporal grain to average environmental conditions at that same grain size, we are able to determine observed environmental sensitivities for multiple phenological metrics at that spatial and temporal scale. We demonstrate that different phenological events change distinctly and predictably with spatial and temporal measurement scale, opening the way to incorporating scaling laws into predictions. Using plant flowering as our example, we identify that the timing of the beginnings or ends of an event (e.g., First Flower date, Last Flower date), can be especially sensitive to the spatial and temporal grain (or resolution) of observations. Our work provides an initial assessment of the role of observation scale in landscape phenology, and a general approach for incorporating scale-dependence into predictions of a variety of phenological time series.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in quantity and timing of foliar and reproductive phenology of tropical dry-forest trees under a warming and drying climate 94%
- Functional traits predict species responses to environmental variation in a California grassland annual plant community 94%
- Spatially variable competition contributes to mismatched responses of plant fitness and occurrence to environmental gradients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Disentangling key species interactions in diverse and heterogeneous communities: A Bayesian sparse modeling approach 94%
- Predictions of biodiversity are improved by integrating trait-based competition with abiotic filtering 93%
- Time is of the essence: A general framework for uncovering temporal structures of communities 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Disorder or a new order: how climate change affects phenological variability 94%
- Quantifying the demographic vulnerabilities of dry woodlands to climate and competition using range-wide monitoring data 94%
- Inferring ecological selection from multidimensional community trait distributions along environmental gradients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Geometric and demographic effects explain contrasting fragmentation-biodiversity relationships across scales 94%
- Unifying ecosystem resistance, resilience, and recovery from extreme stress into a single statistical framework 93%
- Fractal triads efficiently sample ecological diversity and processes across spatial scales 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.