Back

Examination of digital images from Macaulay Library to determine avian molt strategies: A case study on molts and plumages in eight species of North American hummingbirds

Pyle, P.

2021-02-03 zoology
10.1101/2021.02.03.429637 bioRxiv
Show abstract

I examined a total of 27,581 images of 6.345 individuals from the Cornell Lab of Ornithologys Macaulay Library to clarify conflicting reports on molt and plumage strategies in eight species of hummingbirds that breed or have bred primarily in the southwestern United States. Fixed replacement sequences from two nodes among primaries and two nodes among secondaries were found without exception, conforming to the findings of previous studies. I concluded that the preformative molt is limited to partial in three species, partial to incomplete in three species, partial to complete in one species, and complete in one species. These molt strategies could be interpreted as having differentiated through synapomorphy, with species between currently recognized clades varying in the extent of their preformative molts; however, given the plastic nature of molt strategies, I predict that this variation will be shaped more by environmental factors than by synapomorphy. Results of this study additionally clarify molt terminology in Trochilidae as based on homologies and establish new criteria for age determinations. The Macaulay Library clearly provides an important resource for the investigation of avian molts and plumages. The results of a validation exercise that I conducted indicate that banders and field ornithologists with a wide range of previous experience can collect accurate data in this manner. I present a road map for such studies and suggest many other questions on avian molt that can also be investigated, including how timing of molts vary geographically and by habitat and how remigial replacement sequences proceed in little-known bird families. I encourage contributors to the Macaulay Library to take and upload images of birds in molt or in worn plumages.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.8%
2
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.3%
4
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
5
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
The Anatomical Record
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
8
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
10
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Journal of Thermal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
16
General and Comparative Endocrinology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Journal of Anatomy
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
20
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
21
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
23
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
24
Ecological Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
25
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
Developmental & Comparative Immunology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
27
Systematic Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
28
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
29
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
30
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%