Back

Heartbeat-evoked potentials during interoceptive-exteroceptive integration are not consistent with precision-weighting

Banellis, L.; Cruse, D.

2021-02-05 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.02.03.429610 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Interoceptive-exteroceptive integration is fundamental for a unified interactive experience of the world with the body. Predictive coding accounts propose that these integrated signals operate predictively, with regulation by precision-weighting. Heartbeat-evoked potentials (HEPs) are one means to investigate integrated processing. In a previous study, consistent with predictive coding characterisations of precision-weighting, we observed modulation of HEPs by attention. However, we found no evidence of HEP modulation by participants interoceptive ability, despite the characterisation by predictive coding theories of trait abilities as a similar reflection of differential precision-weighting. In this study, we sought to more sensitively test the hypothesised trait-precision influences on HEPs by using an individually-adjusted measure of interoceptive performance. However, contrary to a precision-weighted predictive coding framework, we failed to find evidence in support of the HEP modulations by attentional-precision or trait-precision. Nonetheless, we observed robust HEP effects indicative of an expectation of a sound on the basis of a heartbeat -i.e. interoceptive-exteroceptive integration. It is possible that under our more individually-tailored task, participants relied less on attentional-precision to boost predictions due to an enhanced perception of cardio-audio synchrony. Furthermore, assessing interoceptive ability is challenging, thus variations in performance may not accurately reflect trait-precision variations. Nevertheless, in sum, our findings are inconsistent with a precision-weighted prediction error view of the HEP, and highlight the need for clearer definitions of the manipulation and measurement of precision in predictive coding. Finally, our robust interoceptive-exteroceptive integration HEP effects may provide a valuable tool for investigating such integration in both clinical conditions and cognition. Impact statementWe investigate heart-evoked potentials during interoceptive-exteroceptive integration to determine whether cross-modal integrated processes operate under a precision-weighted predictive coding framework. Using a more sensitive individually-tailored task, we found no evidence of the modulation of cardio-audio expectation by attention or individual differences in interoceptive perception (i.e. by state or trait measures of precision). Nonetheless, we replicate evidence of cardiac-driven predictions of auditory stimuli, providing a potential tool for investigating their relationship with emotion and embodied selfhood.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
2
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.3%
4
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
5
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
7
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
Biological Psychology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
11
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.6%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.3%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 28%
2.1%
15
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
16
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
17
Brain and Language
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
18
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
21
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
22
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
23
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
26
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
27
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
28
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
30
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%