Back

Site-specific decrease in cortical reactivity during sensory trick in cervical dystonia patients.

Thirugnanasambandam, N.; Singh, S.; Cho, H. J.; Shitara, H.; Panyakaew, P.; Lee, S. W.; Hallett, M.

2021-02-03 neurology
10.1101/2021.02.01.21250820 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSensory tricks (SeT) are various maneuvers that can alleviate dystonic contractions and are a characteristic feature of cervical dystonia (CD). The neurophysiology underlying SeT, however, remains largely unknown. Reducing the abnormal cortical facilitation and modulating the abnormal cortical and subcortical oscillatory activity are mechanisms that have been proposed. The supplementary motor area (SMA) and primary sensorimotor cortices are thought to be relevant to this phenomenon. ObjectiveIn the current study, using concurrent EEG recording during transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the SMA and primary motor cortex (M1), we aimed at determining the changes in cortical reactivity and oscillatory changes induced by SeT. MethodsWe recruited 13 patients with CD who exhibited SeT and equal number of age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Single TMS pulses were delivered over the SMA and M1 either at rest or during SeT. 32-channel EEG was recorded, and TMS-evoked potentials (TEP) were obtained. Further, time-frequency analysis was performed on the induced data. Correlation analysis for significant neurophysiological parameters was done with clinical measures. ResultsWe found that SeT induced a significant decrease in the amplitude of TEP elicited from M1 stimulation at [~]210-260ms in patients, which correlated with symptom duration. Post hoc analysis of EMG activity in the neck muscles revealed that this effect on TEP was present only in the subset of patients with effective SeT. ConclusionOur results suggest that SeT reduces cortical reactivity over M1 approximately 200ms after stimulation. This adds support to the idea that reduced cortical facilitation underlies the phenomenon.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
4
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
6
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
8
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
9
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
10
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
18
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
20
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
23
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%