Multisensory correlation computations in the human brain uncovered by a time-resolved encoding model
Pesnot Lerousseau, J.; Parise, C. V.; Ernst, M. O.; van Wassenhove, V.
Show abstract
Neural mechanisms that arbitrate between integrating and segregating multisensory information are essential for complex scene analysis and for the resolution of the multisensory correspondence problem. However, these mechanisms and their dynamics remain largely unknown, partly because classical models of multisensory integration are static. Here, we used the Multisensory Correlation Detector, a model that provides a good explanatory power for human behavior while incorporating dynamic computations. Participants judged whether sequences of auditory and visual signals originated from the same source (causal inference) or whether one modality was leading the other (temporal order), while being recorded with magnetoencephalography. To test the match between the Multisensory Correlation Detector dynamics and the magnetoencephalographic recordings, we developed a novel dynamic encoding-model approach of electrophysiological activity, which relied on temporal response functions. First, we confirm that the Multisensory Correlation Detector explains causal inference and temporal order patterns well. Second, we found strong fits of brain activity to the two outputs of the Multisensory Correlation Detector in temporo-parietal cortices, a region with known multisensory integrative properties. Finally, we report an asymmetry in the goodness of the fits, which were more reliable during the causal inference than during the temporal order judgment task. Overall, our results suggest the plausible existence of multisensory correlation detectors in the human brain, which explain why and how causal inference is strongly driven by the temporal correlation of multisensory signals.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Different computations over the same inputs produce selective behavior in algorithmic brain networks 97%
- THINGS-data: A multimodal collection of large-scale datasets for investigating object representations in human brain and behavior 97%
- Linguistic processing of task-irrelevant speech at a Cocktail Party 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Oscillatory brain networks in continuous speaking and listening 97%
- Many but not all deep neural network audio models capture brain responses and exhibit correspondence between model stages and brain regions 96%
- Sustained neural rhythms reveal endogenous oscillations supporting speech perception 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.