Back

REACT-1 round 8 final report: high average prevalence with regional heterogeneity of trends in SARS-CoV-2 infection in the community in England during January 2021

Riley, S.; Eales, O.; Walters, C. E.; Wang, H.; Ainslie, K. E. C.; Atchinson, C.; Fronterre, C.; Diggle, P. J.; Ashby, D.; Donnelly, C. A.; Cooke, G.; Barclay, W.; Ward, H.; Darzi, A.; Elliott, P.

2021-01-31 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.01.28.21250606 medRxiv
Show abstract

In early January 2021, England entered its third national lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic to reduce numbers of deaths and pressure on healthcare services, while rapidly rolling out vaccination to healthcare workers and those most at risk of severe disease and death. REACT-1 is a survey of SARS-CoV-2 prevalence in the community in England, based on repeated cross-sectional samples of the population. Between 6th and 22nd January 2021, out of 167,642 results, 2,282 were positive giving a weighted national prevalence of infection of 1.57% (95% CI, 1.49%, 1.66%). The R number nationally over this period was estimated at 0.98 (0.92, 1.04). Prevalence remained high throughout, but with suggestion of a decline at the end of the study period. The average national trend masked regional heterogeneity, with robustly decreasing prevalence in one region (South West) and increasing prevalence in another (East Midlands). Overall prevalence at regional level was highest in London at 2.83% (2.53%, 3.16%). Although prevalence nationally was highest in the low-risk 18 to 24 year old group at 2.44% (1.96%, 3.03%), it was also high in those over 65 years who are most at risk, at 0.93% (0.82%, 1.05%). Large household size, living in a deprived neighbourhood, and Black and Asian ethnicity were all associated with higher levels of infections compared to smaller households, less deprived neighbourhoods and other ethnicities. Healthcare and care home workers, and other key workers, were more likely to test positive compared to other workers. If sustained lower prevalence is not achieved rapidly in England, pressure on healthcare services and numbers of COVID-19 deaths will remain unacceptably high.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.0%
2
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.7%
5
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
6
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.5%
8
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
9
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.0%
10
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
11
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
13
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
14
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
15
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
16
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
17
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.6%
19
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
20
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
23
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
24
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
28
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
29
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
30
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%