The neural response to the temporal fine structure of continuous musical pieces is not affected by selective attention
Etard, O.; Ben Messaoud, R.; Gaugain, G.; Reichenbach, T.
Show abstract
Speech and music are spectro-temporally complex acoustic signals that a highly relevant for humans. Both contain a temporal fine structure that is encoded in the neural responses of subcortical and cortical processing centres. The subcortical response to the temporal fine structure of speech has recently been shown to be modulated by selective attention to one of two competing voices. Music similarly often consists of several simultaneous melodic lines, and a listener can selectively attend to a particular one at a time. However, the neural mechanisms that enable such selective attention remain largely enigmatic, not least since most investigations to date have focussed on short and simplified musical stimuli. Here we study the neural encoding of classical musical pieces in human volunteers, using scalp electroencephalography (EEG) recordings. We presented volunteers with continuous musical pieces composed of one or two instruments. In the latter case, the participants were asked to selectively attend to one of the two competing instruments and to perform a vibrato identification task. We used linear encoding and decoding models to relate the recorded EEG activity to the stimulus waveform. We show that we can measure neural responses to the temporal fine structure of melodic lines played by one single instrument, at the population level as well as for most individual subjects. The neural response peaks at a latency of 7.6 ms and is not measurable past 15 ms. When analysing the neural responses elicited by competing instruments, we find no evidence of attentional modulation. Our results show that, much like speech, the temporal fine structure of music is tracked by neural activity. In contrast to speech, however, this response appears unaffected by selective attention in the context of our experiment.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Decoding of selective attention to continuous speech from the human auditory brainstem response 98%
- Natural Music Evokes Correlated EEG Responses Reflecting Temporal Structure and Beat 97%
- Quantifying the individual auditory and visual brain response in 7- month-old infants watching a brief cartoon movie 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Neural Response at the Fundamental Frequency of Speech is Modulated by Word-level Acoustic and Linguistic Information 97%
- Decoding continuous variables from event-related potential (ERP) data with linear support vector regression (SVR) using the Decision Decoding Toolbox (DDTBOX) 95%
- Cortical tracking of voice pitch in the presence of multiple speakers depends on selective attention 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bayesian Prior Uncertainty and Surprisal Elicit Distinct Neural Patterns During Sound Localization in Dynamic Environments 96%
- Disentangling the Functional Roles of Pre-Stimulus Oscillations in Crossmodal Associative Memory Formation via Sensory Entrainment 96%
- Sound perception in realistic surgery scenarios: Towards EEG-based auditory work strain measures for medical personnel. 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cortical encoding of melodic expectations in human temporal cortex 98%
- Local cortical desynchronization and pupil-linked arousal differentially shape brain states for optimal sensory performance 96%
- Modulation of aperiodic EEG activity provides sensitive index of cognitive state changes during working memory task 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Chimeric music reveals an interaction of pitch and time in electrophysiological signatures of music encoding 98%
- General auditory and speech-specific contributions to cortical envelope tracking revealed using auditory chimeras 97%
- Timing of speech in brain and glottis and the feedback delay problem in motor control 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.