Back

Ranitidine use, N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) production and variations in cancer diagnoses

Braunstein, L. Z.; Kantor, E. D.; O'Connell, K.; Hudspeth, A.; Kucera, K.; Wu, Q.; Light, D. Y.

2021-01-29 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2021.01.27.21250656 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionRanitidine is a member of the H2-blocker class of medications, commonly used in the treatment gastroesophageal reflux and peptic ulcer disease. Recent laboratory analyses have demonstrated that ranitidine may yield the probable carcinogen, N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA). Here, we characterized the kinetics of NDMA production from ranitidine under various simulated gastric conditions. Moreover, we conducted a cross-sectional epidemiologic analysis to evaluate potential associations between ranitidine use and various cancer presentations. MethodsThe formation of NDMA in the presence of ranitidine was studied in a series of experiments conducted in simulated gastric fluid (SGF), while varying pH, nitrite concentration, and time of reaction. Chemical analyses of NDMA yield were performed by liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry per FDA guidelines on the detection of NDMA from ranitidine drug products. To evaluate potential associations between ranitidine use and cancer diagnoses, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis among a population of oncology patients, following institutional review board approval. Analyses were limited to those reporting use of ranitidine or an active comparator (i.e. proton-pump inhibitor [PPI] or other H2-blocker) to partially mitigate potential confounding. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to identify associations between ranitidine and certain cancers, adjusted for age, sex, race, ethnicity, and body-mass index. ResultsIncreasing sodium nitrite concentrations in SGF at pH 1.2 were associated with increasing NDMA yield. At a pH of 2.5, previously identified as the optimal reaction condition, samples collected at incubation times of 1, 2 and 4 hours (approximating typical gastric emptying conditions) showed a continued increase in NDMA over time. Notably, the reaction trajectory suggests NDMA may have continued to form beyond the last observed timepoint of 4 hours. On cross-sectional analysis of an oncology population, use of ranitidine (versus active comparators) was associated with increased odds of presenting with cancers of the breast (OR=1.58; 95%CI: 1.23-2.01) as compared to presentation with another cancer. Similar positive associations were observed for cancers of the thyroid (OR=1.89; 95%CI: 1.18-2.92), bladder (OR=1.58; 95%CI: 1.10-2.21), and prostate (OR=1.80; 95%CI: 1.34-2.39). Conversely, ranitidine was inversely associated with cancers of the colorectum (OR=0.48; 95%CI: 0.30-0.74) and brain (OR=0.56; 95%CI: 0.33-0.89). ConclusionUnder simulated gastric conditions, ranitidine yields increasing amounts of NDMA over time (up to, and likely beyond 4 hours) and with increasing concentrations of sodium nitrite. In addition, among a cohort of cancer patients reporting use of H2-blockers or PPIs at the time of diagnosis, we found an association between ranitidine use and cancers of the breast, thyroid, bladder and prostate. We further observed unexplained inverse associations with cancers of the brain and colorectum. These associations reflect the odds of presenting with different cancers exclusively among an oncology population, and do not directly represent risk in a general population (as there were no cancer-free individuals in this study). Moreover, these exploratory analyses are to be viewed as hypothesis generating and should prompt analyses of larger cohorts with longer follow-up.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
2
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
3
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
4
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
5
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.1%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
9
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
10
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
11
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
12
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
16
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
17
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
19
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
21
Pharmaceutics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
25
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Redox Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
28
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
29
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
30
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%