The prevalence of olfactory dysfunction and its associated factors in patients with COVID-19 infection
Hasan, M. M.; Tamanna, N. A.; Jamal, M. N.; Uddin, M. J.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo determine the prevalence of olfactory dysfunctions, mainly, anosmia and to identify its associated factors in patients with COVID-19 infection. Study designA hospital-based prospective observational cohort study SettingA COVID dedicated hospital, Square Hospitals Ltd., Dhaka, Bangladesh. MethodsWe collected patients information including laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 test results. We used Pearson Chi-square test and logistic regression model to assess the associations between demographic and clinical characteristics and olfactory outcomes. ResultsOut of 600 COVID-19 positive patients, 38.7% were diagnosed with olfactory dysfunction. Our analyses showed that patients age, smoking status, cough, dyspnea, sore throat, asthenia, and nausea or vomiting were significantly associated with the anosmia. We observed the risk of developing anosmia was greater in younger patients than in older patients, and this risk decreased as age increased [odds ratio (OR) range for different age groups: 1.26 to 1.08]. Smoking patients were 1.73 times more likely to experience anosmia than non-smoking patients [OR=1.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.01-2.98]. In addition, patients complained asthenia had a significantly double risk of developing the anosmia [OR = 1.96, CI = 1.23-3.06]. ConclusionsOur study shows that about 39% of patients diagnosed with olfactory dysfunction. Patients age, smoking status, and asthenia are significantly positively associated with the anosmia. Since anosmia can be a significant marker for the diagnosis of COVID-19, we suggest regular screening of olfactory dysfunction in patients with early symptoms of COVID-19, particularly younger patients, smoker, and complained asthenia.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- High prevalence of long-term psychophysical olfactory dysfunction in patients with COVID-19 95%
- Objective sensory testing methods reveal a higher prevalence of olfactory loss in COVID-19 positive patients compared to subjective methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Persisting Chemosensory Impairments in 366 Healthcare Workers Following COVID-19: An 11-Month Follow-up 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 Disease Severity and Determinants among Ethiopian Patients: A study of the Millennium COVID-19 Care Center 93%
- Long COVID and its associated factors among COVID survivors in the community from a middle-income country – an online cross-sectional study 93%
- Influence of age and gender on taste function of healthy subjects 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence of Chemosensory Dysfunction in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Reveals Significant Ethnic Differences 92%
- A novel maxillofacial technique to deliver drugs to the visual pathway, the optic nerve and the retina using the glymphatic system. 91%
- Methylmalonic acid compromises mitochondrial respiration and reduces the expression of markers of differentiation in SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Olfactory Training Efficiency In Post-COVID-19 Persistent Olfactory Disorders 96%
- The association between dysnatraemia during hospitalisation and post COVID-19 mental fatigue 91%
- Diagnostic accuracy of a novel SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test from standardized self-collected anterior nasal swabs 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Niger State: A Pilot Cross Sectional Study 90%
- Impact on Mental Health of students due to restriction caused by COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional study 90%
- Covid-19 Associated Hepatitis in Children (CAHC) during the second wave of SARS-CoV-2 infections in Central India: Is it a complication or transient phenomenon 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.