Resource selection by the Endangered Arabian tahr: identifying critical habitats for conservation and climate change adaptation.
Ross, S.; Al Rawahi, H.; Al Jahdhami, M. H.
Show abstract
The Arabian tahr is an Endangered mountain ungulate endemic to the Hajar Mountains of Arabia. The Arabian tahr population is in decline and threats to tahr habitat are intensifying, in addition new potential challenges from climate change are emerging. Fundamental to future conservation planning is understanding tahr habitat selection patterns, so we can prioritise habitat protection, and understand how habitat may be used to provide thermal refuge and allow adaptation to climate change impacts. We used GPS collars and resource selection functions to characterise Arabian tahr habitat preferences in Wadi Sareen Nature Reserve, Oman. We found tahr habitat selection was dependent on scale, sex and season. Vegetation resources were only selected at the smallest scales of selection and avoided at other scales. Habitat providing low heat load and thermal refuge were intensely selected at small and medium scales, by both sexes and in both seasons, suggesting the importance of thermal refuges in facilitating thermoregulation. Higher elevations, steep slopes and rugged habitats were selected across all scales tested here, and in previous landscape-scale studies, indicating the fundamental importance of these habitats in supporting Arabian tahr populations. Our results identified critical habitats required to sustain Arabian tahr, and demonstrated the importance of thermal refuges to species living in the hot climates such as the Arabian Peninsula. Given the accessibility of habitat layers, and ease in which the identified habitats can be mapped using a geographical information system, understanding the habitat selection of tahr and other species is a crucial step to increasing conservation management capacity of threatened species. Given our uncertainty of how to conserve wildlife under future climate change, understanding the availability and distribution of wildlife habitat is an important baseline from where we can plan, connect and preserve the resources necessary for wildlife conservation.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Between a rock and a hard place: Effects of land-use change on rock-dwelling animals of lateritic plateaus in the northern Western Ghats 96%
- Land use and oriental pied hornbill occurrence in Singapore 95%
- Spatial behaviors and seasonal habitat use of the increasingly endangered thick-billed parrot (Rhynchopsitta pachyrhyncha) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between land use, land cover, plant genera, and pollinator abundance in mixed-use landscapes 95%
- Space use and resource selection of bobcats in the Appalachian Mountains of western Virginia 94%
- Behavior-specific occupancy patterns of Pinyon Jays (Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus) in three Great Basin study areas and significance for pinyon-juniper woodland management 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Biomass, abundances, and abundance and geographical range size relationship of birds along a rainforest elevational gradient in Papua New Guinea 95%
- Characterization of habitat requirements of European fishing spiders 94%
- Predicted distribution of a rare and understudied forest carnivore: Humboldt martens (Martes caurina humboldtensis) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Terrain ruggedness and human activities influence the distribution of Grauer's gorillas (Gorilla beringei graueri) and eastern chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) in the Tayna Nature Reserve, Democratic Republic of Congo 95%
- Anthropogenic supply of nutrients in a wildlife reserve may compromise conservation success 95%
- Nomadic ungulate movements under threat: Declining mobility of Mongolian gazelles in the Eastern Steppe. 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.