Predicting the Specificity-Determining Positions of Paralogous Complexes
Karakulak, T.; Rifaioglu, A. S.; Rodrigues, J.; Karaca, E.
Show abstract
Due to its clinical relevance, modulation of functionally relevant amino acids in protein-protein complexes has attracted a great deal of attention. To this end, many approaches have been proposed to predict partner-selecting, i.e., specificity-determining positions in evolutionarily close complexes. These approaches can be grouped into sequence-based machine learning and structure-based energy-driven methods. In this work, we assessed these methods ability to map the specificity-determining positions of Axl, a receptor tyrosine kinase involved in cancer progression and immune-related diseases. For this, we used three sequence-based predictors - SDPred, Multi-RELIEF, and Sequence Harmony - and a structure-based approach by utilizing HADDOCK and extensive molecular dynamics simulations. As a result, we show that (i) sequence-based methods overpredict the number of specificity-determining positions for Axl complexes and that (ii) combining sequence-based approaches with HADDOCK provides the most coherent set of predictions. Our work lays out a critical study on the comparative performance specificity-determining position predictors. It also presents a combined sequence-structure-based approach, which can guide the development of therapeutic molecules capable of combatting Axl misregulation in different types of diseases.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolutionary History of Calcium-Sensing Receptors Unveils Hyper/Hypocalcemia-Causing Mutations 94%
- Towards a comprehensive view of the pocketome universe - biological implications and algorithmic challenges. 94%
- IgStrand: A universal residue numbering scheme for the Immunoglobulin-fold (Ig-fold) to study Ig-Proteomes and Ig-Interactomes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.