Outcomes of Ivermectin in the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Castaneda-Sabogal, A.; Chambergo-Michilot, D.; Toro-Huamanchumo, C. J.; Silva-Rengifo, C.; Gonzales-Zamora, J.; Barboza, J. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundTo assess the outcomes of ivermectin in ambulatory and hospitalized patients with COVID-19. MethodsFive databases and websites for preprints were searched until January 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective cohorts assessing ivermectin versus control in ambulatory and hospitalized participants. The primary outcome was overall mortality. Secondary outcome was recovered patients. For meta-analysis, random-effects and inverse variance meta-analyses with logarithmic transformation were performed. ROBINS-I for cohort studies, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool for trials were used. The strength of evidence was assessed using GRADE. ResultsAfter the selection, twelve studies (five retrospective cohort studies, six randomized clinical trials and one case series), were included. In total, 7412 participants were reported, the mean age was 47.5 (SD 9.5) years, and 4283 (58%) were male. Ivermectin was not associated with reduced mortality (logRR: 0.89, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.70, p = 0.04, I2= 84.7%), or reduced patient recovery (logRR 5.52, 95% CI -24.36 to 35.4, p = 0.51, I2 = 92.6%). All studies had a high risk of bias, and showed a very low certainty of the evidence. ConclusionsThere insufficient certainty and quality of evidence to recommend the use of ivermectin to prevent or treat ambulatory or hospitalized patients with COVID-19.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for the systematic review of the Pneumocystis jirovecii -associated pneumonia in non-HIV immunocompromised patients 95%
- Application of observational research methods to real-world studies for rare disease drugs: a scoping review protocol 94%
- The Effect of Famotidine on Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) drug efficacy study landscape: a systematic scoping review of clinical trials and observational studies to assess the feasibility of establishing an individual participant-level data (IPD) platform 96%
- Systematic review of the scrub typhus treatment landscape: Assessing the feasibility of an individual participant-level data (IPD) platform 95%
- A systematic review of the clinical profile of patients with bubonic plague and the outcome measures used in research settings 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hydroxychloroquine and mortality risk of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of human comparative studies 94%
- A placebo-controlled double blind trial of hydroxychloroquine in mild-to-moderate COVID-19 93%
- GRADING prognostic factors for severe and recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: expected and unexpected findings. A systematic review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Jinhua Qinggan Granules for Nonhospitalized COVID-19 Patients: a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
- The efficacy of Andrographis paniculata (Burm.f.) Wall. ex Nees crude extract in hospitalised mild COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study 92%
- Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, clinical trial to study co-administration of Ashwagandha on safety, immunogenicity, and protection with COVID-19 vaccine – A Study Protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Favorable outcome on viral load and culture viability using Ivermectin in early treatment of non-hospitalized patients with mild COVID-19, A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial. 95%
- Efficacy of remdesivir in hospitalised COVID-19 patients in Japan: A large observational study using the COVID-19 Registry Japan 92%
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of published research data on COVID-19 infection-fatality rates 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.