Back

Opposing effects of competitive exclusion determine invasion outcomes and structure ant assemblages

Wong, M. K. L.; Lee, R. H.; Leong, C.-M.; Lewis, O. T.; Guenard, B.

2021-01-26 ecology
10.1101/2021.01.25.428088 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding how species phenotypic differences affect competition is key to explaining community assembly and predicting biodiversity responses. Many studies overlook the variable effects that species trait differences can have on the direction of competitive exclusion, which reverses depending on the specific mechanism at play. We performed a comprehensive trait-based study of an ant invasion integrating morphological, dietary, physiological and behavioral analyses. We found that trait differences between invasive and resident species were not only associated with niche differences which promoted the coexistence of dissimilar species, but also competitive ability differences which acted in the opposite fashion. Furthermore, competition along separate trait axes led to complex and contrasting patterns in the invaded assemblages, where species were at once similar (clustered) in some traits but also dissimilar (overdispersed) in others. Our results reveal that different aspects of phenotype may distinctly modulate the effect of competition in structuring ecological communities and functional diversity.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
● 393 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.5%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Ecology Letters
○ 135 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.1%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.6%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
4
Functional Ecology
○ 61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.3%
Similar papers in this journal
5
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.1%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.7%
7
Biology Letters
● 76 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
8
Ecology
○ 85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
9
The American Naturalist
● 125 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.3%
10
Oecologia
○ 28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
11
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
12
Nature Ecology & Evolution
131 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Molecular Ecology
○ 336 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
14
PNAS Nexus
◐ 159 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Journal of Animal Ecology
○ 75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
PLOS Biology
● 486 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
17
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.1%
18
Ecology and Evolution
○ 267 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
● 51 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
20
Royal Society Open Science
● 214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
21
Journal of Applied Ecology
○ 39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
23
Oikos
○ 84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Ecography
○ 54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Current Biology
○ 665 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%
26
BMC Ecology and Evolution
○ 51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.