Oral ulcers of COVID-19 patients: a scoping review protocol
Riad, A.; Issa, J.; Chuchmova, V.; Gomaa, E.; Pokorna, A.; Klugarova, J.; Klugar, M.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThis scoping review aims to systematically identify the types, characteristics, and possible pathophysiologic etiologies of the oral ulcers that emerge in COVID-19 patients. IntroductionThe oral cavity is a vulnerable niche for the most diverse microbial ecosystem in the human body; therefore, it presents a wide array of mucocutaneous complications that could indicate various acute and chronic conditions. The COVID-19-related oral conditions, including oral ulcers, had been widely debated as direct manifestations or indirect complications of the SARS-CoV-2 infection. According to a preliminary search of PROSPERO, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the JBI Evidence Synthesis, there is no published nor registered scoping review concerned with the oral ulcers of COVID-19 patients. Inclusion criteriaThe review will include studies included COVID-19 patients whose infection had been confirmed by RT-PCR testing regardless of infection severity and clinical course. Only the studies that reported COVID-19 patients with oral ulcers. MethodsA three-phase search strategy will be carried out: an initial limited search, a full electronic search, and hand search using the reference lists of all included records. The main bibliographic databases of published literature will include MEDLINE(R) (Ovid), EMBASE (Elsevier), and Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register. All identified records will be managed using EndNote 9.2, and the titles and abstracts will be screened against the inclusion criteria before the full text of all potentially relevant studies will be examined. The data will be presented in tabular form, rating maps, and narrative summary. RegistrationThis protocol had been pre-registered in Open Science Framework (OSF) Registries.[1]
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- What are the impacts of oral complications from cancer therapy on the quality of life of children? A protocol to update a scoping review 95%
- Effectiveness of integrating cervical cancer prevention strategies into HIV care programmes: A mixed-methods systematic review protocol 95%
- Protocol for the systematic review of the Pneumocystis jirovecii -associated pneumonia in non-HIV immunocompromised patients 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of RNA extraction free method for detection of SARS-COV-2 in salivary samples for mass screening for COVID-19 92%
- Expression of nitric oxide synthase and nitric oxide levels in peripheral blood cells and oxidized low-density lipoprotein levels in saliva as early markers of severe dengue 91%
- Which surface treatment improves the long-term repair bond strength of aged methacrylate-based composite resin restorations? A systematic review and network meta-analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- International Prevalence Of Consultation With A Naturopathic Practitioner: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis 94%
- Palliative care in the treatment of women with breast cancer: a scoping review protocol 93%
- Exploring Risk Factors for Comorbid Depression in Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review Protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quality assessment of studies included in Cochrane oral health systematic reviews 93%
- Prevalence of Mental Health Disorders among Elderly Diabetics and Associated Risk Factors in Indonesia 91%
- Half Year Longitudinal Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2-antibodies and Rule Compliance in German Hospital Employees 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health-seeking behaviour and beliefs around sore throat in The Gambia: a qualitative study 92%
- Patient knowledge, attitudes and practices on chronic wound infections in Tanga Regional Referral Hospital, Tanzania; a qualitative study 92%
- Prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and its association with glycemic control in persons with type 2 diabetes in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.