The photosensitive phase acts as a sensitive window for seasonal multisensory neuroplasticity in male and female starlings
Orije, J. E.; Cardon, E.; Hamaide, J.; Jonckers, E.; Darras, V. M.; Verhoye, M.; Van der Linden, A.
Show abstract
Traditionally, research unraveling seasonal neuroplasticity in songbirds has focused on the male song control system and testosterone. We longitudinally monitored the song and neuroplasticity in male and female starlings during multiple photoperiods using Diffusion Tensor and Fixel-Based techniques. These exploratory data-driven whole-brain methods resulted in a population-based tractogram uncovering microstructural sexual dimorphisms in the song control system and beyond. Male brains showed microstructural hemispheric asymmetries, whereas females had higher interhemispheric connectivity, which could not be attributed to brain size differences. Only females with large brains sing but differ from males in their song behavior by showing involvement of the hippocampus. Both sexes experienced multisensory neuroplasticity in the song control, auditory and visual system, and the cerebellum, mainly during the photosensitive period. This period with low gonadal hormones might represent a sensitive window during which different sensory and motor systems in telencephalon and cerebellum can be seasonally re-shaped in both sexes.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Experience- and sex-dependent intrinsic plasticity in the zebra finch auditory cortex during song memorization 93%
- Multimodal imaging brain markers in early adolescence are linked with a physically active lifestyle 92%
- Neuromorphological changes following selection for tameness and aggression in the Russian fox-farm experiment 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.