Barriers and facilitators to cross-sector workforce competency assessment in the care of older people residing in care homes
Tiplday, S.; Thompson, J.; Cook, G.; Bainbridge, L.
Show abstract
In recent years, transformation in care delivery towards cross-sector models has occurred with the aim of providing safe, efficient care for older people with complex needs, including those living in care homes. Effective workforce competency development and assessment across sectors is integral to these models. However, there is much evidence to suggest a distinct lack of cross-sector alignment with regard to competency development and assessment, which could lead to variations in practice and affect outcomes for older people. This qualitative study explored the barriers and facilitators to cross-sector workforce competency assessment in the care of older people residing in care homes. Twenty nine staff with responsibility for staff learning and development participated. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarkes (2006) six phase thematic analysis approach. Findings indicate that a significant challenge to the development of a competent workforce is evidencing competency, due to difficulties in finding appropriate assessors and inconsistencies in the assessment process. Findings also indicate potential solutions including: a system-wide, standardised framework and strategy for assessment of competence; policy for the sign-off of competencies that is recognised across organisational boundaries; and adopting practice-based approaches to competence development and assessment.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods multi-site case study of a person-centred intervention for constant observation in hospitals with people living with dementia 96%
- What support do frontline workers want? A qualitative study of health and social care workers’ experiences and views of psychosocial support during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability of a behavioural intervention to mitigate the psychological impacts of COVID-19 restrictions in older people with long-term conditions: a qualitative study 95%
- The Impact on Staff of Providing Non-Invasive Advanced Respiratory Support During the Covid-19 Pandemic A Qualitative Study in an Acute Hospital 95%
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Care homes, their communities, and resilience in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic: interim findings from a qualitative study 96%
- “It makes you realise your own mortality.” A qualitative study on mental health of older adults in the UK during COVID-19 95%
- Deconditioning in people living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from the Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED) process evaluation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transnational adoptees in healthcare: barriers, resources, and needs 92%
- Is my cough a cold or covid? A qualitative study of COVID-19 symptom recognition and attitudes towards testing in the UK 92%
- Agility and sustainability: A qualitative evaluation of COVID-19 Non-pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) in the UK logistics sector 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Variation in ambulance pre-alert process and practice: Cross-sectional survey of ambulance clinicians 91%
- Impact on all-cause mortality of a case prediction and prevention intervention designed to reduce secondary care utilisation: findings from a randomised controlled trial 90%
- Evaluating the impact of a pulse oximetry remote monitoring programme on mortality and healthcare utilisation in patients with covid-19 assessed in Accident and Emergency departments in England: a retrospective matched cohort study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.