Back

How to align arthropod legs

Bruce, H. S.

2021-01-21 developmental biology
10.1101/2021.01.20.427514 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Arthropods (insects, "crustaceans", myriapods, and chelicerates) display a fascinating diversity of ectodermal structures like plates, horns, helmets, knobs, carapaces, mimicry outgrowths, and wings. The origins and relationships of these structures has tantalized researchers for over a century: did these structures arise de novo in each lineage, or do they emerge from shared, ancestral primordia present in some or even all arthropods? One way to begin answering this is to assess the position and context of these structures on arthropod bodies: do these structures emerge from proximal embryonic leg segments that were converted into the body wall, or do they represent dorsal, non-leg-derived structures? Here, the expression of pannier, araucan, and drumstick - genes previously shown to distinguish proximal leg segments in crustaceans and insects - are examined in a chelicerate representative, the tarantula Acanthoscurria. This gene expression comparison, together with over a century of gene functional, morphological, embryological, and paleontological data, suggests that all arthropod leg segments correspond to each other in a one-to-one fashion, but that in many arthropod lineages, the base of the ancestral leg in the embryo flattens and expands to form the body wall of the adult. This would mean that many arthropod outgrowths which appear to stand on the lateral body wall, such as wings, tergal plates, and gin traps, are derived from the ancestral/embryonic leg base, and likely arose from shared, ancestral primordia present on this leg base in all arthropods. The analysis detailed here means that a simple three- or four-gene in situ expression experiment with pannier, araucan, and drumstick can elucidate the homologies of any arthropod ectodermal structure of interest, including beetle horns, treehopper helmets, and more.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.7%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.7%
3
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.3%
4
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
EvoDevo
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
8
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.6%
9
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.1%
11
Developmental Dynamics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
12
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
14
Journal of Comparative Neurology
66 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
17
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
19
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.2%
20
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.1%
22
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
23
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%