Back

The power of dying slowly - persistence as unintentional dormancy

Rebelo, J. S.; Domingues, C. P. F.; Monteiro, F.; Nogueira, T.; Dionisio, F.

2021-01-20 microbiology
10.1101/2021.01.20.427471 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Persistence is a state of bacterial dormancy where cells with low metabolic activity and growth rates are phenotypically tolerant to antibiotics and other cytotoxic substances. Given its obvious advantage to bacteria, several researchers have been looking for the genetic mechanism behind persistence. However, other authors argue that there is no such mechanism and that persistence results from inadvertent cell errors. In this case, the persistent population should decay according to a power-law with a particular exponent of -2. Studying persisters decay is, therefore, a valuable way to understand persistence. Here we simulated the fate of susceptible cells in laboratory experiments in the context of indirect resistance. Eventually, under indirect resistance, detoxifying drug-resistant cells save the persister cells that leave the dormant state and resume growth. The simulations presented here show that, by assuming a power-law decline, the exponent is close to -2, which is the expected value if persistence results from unintentional errors. Whether persisters are cells in a moribund state or, on the contrary, result from a genetic program, should impact the research of anti-persistent drugs. Author SummaryPersistence, a form of bacterial dormancy, was discovered in the early days of the antibiotic era. Thanks to dormancy, these cells often evade antibiotic therapy and the immune system. However, despite its clinical importance, this phenotypes nature is still under debate. Arguably, the prevailing view is that persistence is an evolved (selected for) bet-hedging mechanism to survive in the presence of cytotoxic agents such as antibiotics. In that case, the persister population should decay exponentially, although at a much slower pace than the non-persister population. A few authors recently advanced an alternative hypothesis: bacterial persistence results from many malfunctions and cell division errors. In this case, persistent populations should decay according to a power-law with exponent of -2, that is, according to 1/t2. Here we simulated the fate of susceptible bacterial cells in the presence of bactericidal antibiotics in the context of indirect resistance based on laboratory experiments performed earlier. By showing that the dynamics of persister cells is consistent with 1/t2, our results corroborate the hypothesis that the phenomenon of bacterial persistence is an accidental consequence of inadvertent cell problems and errors. If confirmed, this conclusion should impact the research strategies of anti-persistent drugs. O_QD"The following day, no one died. This fact, being absolutely contrary to lifes rules, provoked enormous and, in the circumstances, perfectly justifiable anxiety in peoples minds, for we have only to consider that in the entire forty volumes of universal history there is no mention, not even one exemplary case, of such a phenomenon ever having occurred..." Death with interruptions Jose Saramago (2005) Nobel Prize for Literature 1998 C_QD

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.4%
2
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
3
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.3%
6
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.0%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
4.0%
8
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
9
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.6%
10
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
11
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
12
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
14
Journal of Biosciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
17
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
20
microLife
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
21
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
22
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
23
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
24
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
26
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
27
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
28
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
30
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%