Use Of Canine Olfactory Detection For COVID-19 Testing Study On U.A.E. Trained Detection Dog Sensitivity
Granjean, D.; Al Marzooqi, D. H.; Lecoq-Julien, C.; Al Hammadi, H. K.; Alvergnat, G.; Al Blooshi, K. M.; Al Mazrooei, S. K.; Alhmoudi, M. S.; Al Ahbabi, F. M.; Mohammed, Y. S.; Al Falasi, N. M.; Almheiri, N. M.; Al Blooshi, S. M.; Muzzin, Q.; Desquilbet, L.
Show abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of 21 dogs belonging to different United Arab Emirates (UAE) Ministry of Interior (MOI), trained for COVID-19 olfactory detection. The study involved 17 explosives detection dogs, two cadaver detection dogs and two dogs with no previous detection training. Training lasted two weeks before starting the validation protocol. Sequential five and seven-cone line-ups were used with axillary sweat samples from symptomatic COVID-19 individuals (SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive) and from asymptomatic COVID-19 negative individuals (SARS-CoV-2 PCR negative). A total of 1368 trials were performed during validation, including 151 positive and 110 negative samples. Each line-up had one positive sample and at least one negative sample. The dog had to mark the positive sample, randomly positioned behind one of the cones. The dog, handler and data recorder were blinded to the positive sample location. The calculated overall sensitivities were between 71% and 79% for three dogs, between83% and 87% for three other dogs, and equal to or higher than 90% for the remaining 15 dogs (more than two thirds of the 21 dogs). After calculating the overall sensitivity for each dog using all line-ups, "matched" sensitivities were calculated only including line-ups containing COVID-19 positive and negative samples strictly comparable on confounding factors such as diabetes, anosmia, asthma, fever, body pain, diarrhoea, sex, hospital, method of sweat collection and sampling duration. Most of the time, the sensitivities increased after matching. Pandemic conditions in the U.A.E., associated with the desire to use dogs as an efficient mass-pretesting tool has already led to the operational deployment of the study dogs. Future studies will focus on comparatives fields-test results including the impact of the main COVID-19 comorbidities and other respiratory tract infections.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-COV-2 Virus Infected Patient Identification Through Canine Olfactive Detection On Axillary Sweat Samples 99%
- Diagnostic Accuracy Of Non-Invasive Detection Of SARS-COV-2 Infection By Canine Olfaction 97%
- Are dogs with congenital hearing and/or vision impairments so different from sensory normal dogs?A survey of demographics, morphology, health, behaviour, communication, and activities 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Welfare at group and individual level: optical flow patterns of broiler chicken flocks are correlated with the behaviour of individual birds 94%
- Modelling the deathbed of ASF-infected wild boars in South Korea using 2019-2020 national surveillance data 91%
- Housing conditions affect adult zebrafish (Danio rerio) behavior but not their physiological status 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A multidimensional analysis of the risk of infection with Ehrlichia canis among urban dogs in Iquitos, Peru. 94%
- Assessing the impact of free-roaming dog population management through systems modelling 93%
- Evaluation of Cognitive Function in the Dog Aging Project: Associations with Baseline Canine Characteristics 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Welfare concerns for mounted load carrying by working donkeys in Pakistan 93%
- Serum levels and tumour expression of leptin and leptin receptor as promising clinical biomarkers of specific feline mammary carcinoma subtypes 93%
- A comparative meta and in silico analysis of differentially expressed genes and proteins in canine and human bladder cancer 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The development and validation of a survey to measure fecal-oral child exposure to zoonotic enteropathogens: The FECEZ Enteropathogens Index 93%
- Self-tests for COVID-19: what is the evidence? A living systematic review and meta-analysis (2020-2023) 92%
- Community engaged tick surveillance and tickMAP as a public health tool to track the emergence of ticks and tick-borne diseases in New York 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.