Back

Studying the course of Covid-19 by a recursive delay approach

Scholz, E.; Kreck, M.

2021-01-20 epidemiology
10.1101/2021.01.18.21250012 medRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWIn an earlier paper we proposed a recursive model for epidemics; in the present paper we generalize this model to include the asymptomatic or unrecorded symptomatic people, which we call dark people (dark sector). We call this the SEPARd-model. A delay differential equation version of the model is added; it allows a better comparison to other models. We carry this out by a comparison with the classical SIR model and indicate why we believe that the SEPARd model may work better for Covid-19 than other approaches. In the second part of the paper we explain how to deal with the data provided by the JHU, in particular we explain how to derive central model parameters from the data. Other parameters, like the size of the dark sector, are less accessible and have to be estimated more roughly, at best by results of representative serological studies which are accessible, however, only for a few countries. We start our country studies with Switzerland where such data are available. Then we apply the model to a collection of other countries, three European ones (Germany, France, Sweden), the three most stricken countries from three other continents (USA, Brazil, India). Finally we show that even the aggregated world data can be well represented by our approach. At the end of the paper we discuss the use of the model. Perhaps the most striking application is that it allows a quantitative analysis of the influence of the time until people are sent to quarantine or hospital. This suggests that imposing means to shorten this time is a powerful tool to flatten the curves.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
2
Journal of Mathematical Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.2%
5
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
6
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
7
Mathematics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.4%
11
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
12
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.3%
13
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
Nonlinear Dynamics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
18
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.6%
19
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
20
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
Demographic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
23
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Swiss Medical Weekly
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
27
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
28
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
29
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%