Back

Studying the course of Covid-19 by a recursive delay approach

Scholz, E.; Kreck, M.

2021-01-20 epidemiology
10.1101/2021.01.18.21250012
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWIn an earlier paper we proposed a recursive model for epidemics; in the present paper we generalize this model to include the asymptomatic or unrecorded symptomatic people, which we call dark people (dark sector). We call this the SEPARd-model. A delay differential equation version of the model is added; it allows a better comparison to other models. We carry this out by a comparison with the classical SIR model and indicate why we believe that the SEPARd model may work better for Covid-19 than other approaches. In the second part of the paper we explain how to deal with the data provided by the JHU, in particular we explain how to derive central model parameters from the data. Other parameters, like the size of the dark sector, are less accessible and have to be estimated more roughly, at best by results of representative serological studies which are accessible, however, only for a few countries. We start our country studies with Switzerland where such data are available. Then we apply the model to a collection of other countries, three European ones (Germany, France, Sweden), the three most stricken countries from three other continents (USA, Brazil, India). Finally we show that even the aggregated world data can be well represented by our approach. At the end of the paper we discuss the use of the model. Perhaps the most striking application is that it allows a quantitative analysis of the influence of the time until people are sent to quarantine or hospital. This suggests that imposing means to shorten this time is a powerful tool to flatten the curves.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 3%
16.7%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 33%
14.4%
3
Royal Society Open Science
based on 49 papers
Top 0.5%
5.1%
4
Infectious Disease Modelling
based on 50 papers
Top 2%
3.2%
5
Journal of Theoretical Biology
based on 29 papers
Top 0.4%
3.1%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 5%
2.5%
7
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
based on 54 papers
Top 2%
2.5%
8
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
based on 14 papers
Top 0.5%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS Computational Biology
based on 141 papers
Top 5%
2.5%
10
Swiss Medical Weekly
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Frontiers in Physics
based on 11 papers
Top 0.5%
1.9%
12
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
based on 17 papers
Top 0.7%
1.9%
13
Mathematical Biosciences
based on 15 papers
Top 0.8%
1.9%
14
Epidemics
based on 96 papers
Top 5%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 29%
1.7%
16
Biology Methods and Protocols
based on 19 papers
Top 0.8%
1.4%
17
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
based on 17 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
18
Epidemiology and Infection
based on 80 papers
Top 6%
1.4%
19
COVID
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
1.4%
20
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 26%
0.9%
21
Statistics in Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
PLOS Genetics
based on 39 papers
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 26%
0.7%
24
Genetic Epidemiology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Biology
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
0.7%