Radiomics-based patient inclusion model improves clinical trial performance
Tomaszewski, M. R.; Fan, S.; Garcia, A.; Qi, J.; Kim, Y.; Gatenby, R. A.; Schabath, M. B.; Tap, W. D.; Reinke, D. K.; Makanji, R.; Reed, D. R.; Gillies, R. J.
Show abstract
PurposeSuccess of new cancer therapies relies strongly on effective selection of the target patient populations. We hypothesize that computational analysis of imaging data can be used for patient enrichment in clinical trials and hence aimed to establish the appropriate framework for this analysis. MethodsThis was tested among soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients accrued into a randomized clinical trial (SARC021) that evaluated the efficacy of evofosfamide (Evo), a hypoxia activated prodrug, in combination with doxorubicin (Dox). Notably, SARC021 failed to meet its overall survival (OS) objective. We tested whether a radiomic biomarker-driven inclusion/exclusion criterion could have been used to result in a significant treatment benefit of the Evo+Dox combination compared to Dox monotherapy. 164 radiomics features were extracted from 303 SARC021 patients with lung metastases, divided into training and test sets. ResultsA single radiomics feature, Short Run Emphasis, was identified as the most informative. Combined into a model along with histological classification and smoking history, an enriched subset (42%) of patients had longer OS in Evo+Dox vs. Dox groups [p=0.01, Hazard Ratio (HR) =0.57 (0.36-0.90)]. Applying the same model and threshold value in an independent test set confirmed the significant survival difference [p=0.002, HR=0.29 (0.13-0.63)], identifying patients most likely to benefit from doxorubicin alone. ConclusionThe study presents a first of its kind clinical-radiomic approach for patient enrichment in clinical trials. We show that, had an appropriate model been used for selective patient inclusion, SARC021 trial could have met its primary survival objective for patients with metastatic STS.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Phase 1b dose expansion and translational analyses of olaparib in combination with the oral AKT inhibitor capivasertib in recurrent endometrial, triple negative breast, and ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer 92%
- Tumor-specific activity of precision medicines in the NCI-MATCH trial 91%
- Leveraging Longitudinal Patient-Reported Outcomes Trajectories to Predict Survival in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Reanalysis of in vivo drug synergy validation study rules out synergy in most cases 93%
- Integration of clinical, pathological, radiological, and transcriptomic data improves the prediction of first-line immunotherapy outcome in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer 93%
- Integrated radiogenomics models predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high grade serous ovarian cancer 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- ClonoScreen3D: a novel three-dimensional clonogenic screening platform for identification of radiosensitizers for glioblastoma 92%
- Improving SBRT by re-wiring immunosuppressive neutrophils in murine pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 91%
- Circulating Tumor-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Predict Clinical Outcomes in 11C Choline-identified Oligometastatic Castration-Refractory Prostate Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in Phase II trials for cancer therapies 94%
- Machine learning for prediction of immunotherapy efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer from simple clinical and biological data 92%
- Prediction of radiation-induced hypothyroidism using radiomic data analysis does not show superiority over standard normal tissue complication models 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.