Back

Genetic nurture effects on education: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Wang, B.; Baldwin, J. R.; Schoeler, T.; Cheesman, R.; Barkhuizen, W.; Dudbridge, F.; Bann, D.; Morris, T. T.; Pingault, J.-B.

2021-01-17 genetics
10.1101/2021.01.15.426782 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Child educational development is associated with major psychological, social, economic and health milestones throughout the life course. Understanding the early origins of educational inequalities and their reproduction across generations is therefore crucial. Recent genomic studies provide novel insights in this regard, uncovering "genetic nurture" effects, whereby parental genotypes influence offsprings educational development via environmental pathways rather than genetic transmission. These findings have yet to be systematically appraised. We conducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify genetic nurture effects on educational outcomes and investigate key moderators. Twelve studies comprising 38,654 distinct parent(s)-offspring pairs or trios from eight cohorts were included, from which we derived 22 estimates of genetic nurture effects. Multilevel random effects models showed that the effect of genetic nurture on offsprings educational outcomes ({beta}genetic nurture = 0.08, 95% CI [0.07, 0.09]) was about half the size of direct genetic effects ({beta}direct genetic = 0.17, 95% CI [0.13, 0.20]). Maternal and paternal genetic nurture effects were similar in magnitude, suggesting comparable roles of mothers and fathers in determining their childrens educational outcomes. Genetic nurture effects were largely explained by parental educational level and family socioeconomic status, suggesting that genetically influenced environments play an important role in shaping child educational outcomes. Even after accounting for genetic transmission, we provide evidence that environmentally mediated parental genetic influences contribute to the intergenerational transmission of educational outcomes. Further exploring these downstream environmental pathways may inform educational policies aiming to break the intergenerational cycle of educational underachievement and foster social mobility. Public Significance StatementThis meta-analysis demonstrates that parents genetics influence their childrens educational outcomes through the rearing environments that parents provide. This "genetic nurture" effect is largely explained by family socioeconomic status and parental education level, is similar for mothers and fathers (suggesting that both parents equally shape their childrens educational outcomes) and is about half the size of direct genetic effects on childrens educational outcomes. Interventions targeting such environmental pathways could help to break the intergenerational cycle of educational underachievement and foster social mobility.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.0%
3
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.0%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.3%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 10%
7.1%
6
Psychological Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
8
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.2%
10
npj Science of Learning
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
12
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.1%
13
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
14
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
15
Behavior Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
16
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
18
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.1%
22
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
23
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Developmental Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
25
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.7%
28
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%