Back

Muscle Activation Profile While Walking with Perturbations

Rosenblum, U.; Melzer, I.; Zeilig, G.; Plotnik, M.

2021-01-15 physiology
10.1101/2021.01.13.426393 bioRxiv
Show abstract

During an unexpected loss of balance, avoiding a fall requires people to readjust their footing rapidly and effectively. We investigated the activation patterns of the ankle and knee muscles, and muscle fiber type recruitment resulting from unannounced, medio-lateral (i.e., right/left) horizontal-surface walking perturbations in twenty healthy adults (27.00{+/-}2.79 years, 10 females). Surface electromyography (sEMG) total spectral power for specific frequency bands (40-60Hz, 60-150Hz, 150-250Hz, 250-400Hz and 400-1000Hz), from tibialis anterior (TA) and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles were analyzed. Compared to non-perturbed walking, we found a significant increase in the total spectral power of lower-extremity muscles during the first 3 seconds after perturbation. When two feet were on the ground in time of perturbation we found a different muscle fiber type recruitment pattern between VL and TA muscles. This was not significant for perturbations implemented when one foot was on the ground. Our findings suggest that muscle operating frequency is modulated in real time to fit body state and somatosensory input in the context of functional goal requirements such as a rapid change of footing in response to unexpected loss of balance in single and double-support phases of gait. New & NoteworthyTo study muscle spectral profiles in response to loss of balance, we investigated the dynamics of muscle spectral power changes, across different frequency bands after unannounced mechanical perturbations during walking. We showed increased activation of high-frequency motor units of the lower-limb muscles, subside 3 seconds after perturbation. Differences in power increase of specific frequency bands suggest that muscle activation is modulated in real time to fit body state in the context of functional goal requirements.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.2%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.3%
3
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.8%
4
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Physiological Reports
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
6
European Journal of Applied Physiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.8%
8
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
9
Gait & Posture
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
Experimental Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Human Movement Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
14
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
15
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.0%
16
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
17
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
19
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.6%
20
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
21
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%