Individual level prediction of emerging suicide events in the pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorder
Luo, S. X.; Ciarleglio, A.; Galfalvy, H.; Grunebaum, M.; Sher, L.; Mann, J. J.; Oquendo, M. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundPatients with bipolar disorder have a high lifetime risk of suicide. Predicting, preventing and managing suicidal behavior are major goals in clinical practice. Changes in suicidal thoughts and behavior are common in the course of treatment of bipolar disorder. MethodsUsing a dataset from a randomized clinical trial of bipolar disorder treatment (N=98), we tested predictors of future suicidal behavior identified through a review of literature and applied marginal variable selection and machine learning methods. The performance of the models was assessed using the optimism-adjusted C statistic. ResultsNumber of prior hospitalizations, number of prior suicide attempts, current employment status and Hamilton Depression Scale were identified as predictors and a simple logistic regression model was constructed. This model was compared with a model incorporating interactions with treatment group assignment, and more complex variable selection methods (LASSO and Survival Trees). The best performing models had average optimism-adjusted C-statistics of 0.67 (main effects only) and 0.69 (Survival Trees). Incorporating medication group did not improve prediction performance of the models. ConclusionsThese results suggest that models with a few predictors may yield a clinically meaningful way to stratify risk of emerging suicide events in patients who are undergoing pharmacologic treatment for bipolar disorder. Significance StatementThis study aims to find out whether suicide events that occur during the pharmacological treatment of bipolar disorder, a severe psychiatric disorder that is highly associated with suicide behavior, can be predicted. Using existing methods, we developed and compared several predictive models. We showed that these models performed similarly to predictive models of other outcomes, such as treatment efficacy, in unipolar and bipolar depression. This suggests that suicide events during bipolar disorder may be a feasible target for individualized interventions in the future.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Depression is Associated with Treatment Response Trajectories in Adults with Prolonged Grief Disorder: A Machine Learning Analysis 96%
- The Cost-Effectiveness Of Depression Screening For The General Adult Population 95%
- The Impact of Psychopathology, Social Adversity and Stress-relevant DNAm on Prospective Risk for Post-traumatic Stress: A Machine Learning Approach 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential Treatment Benefit Prediction For Treatment Selection in Depression: A Deep Learning Analysis of STAR*D and CO-MED Data 94%
- Computational Mechanisms of Approach-Avoidance Conflict Predictively Differentiate Between Affective and Substance Use Disorders 94%
- Computational modelling reveals slower safety learning and threat extinction are associated with higher anxiety severity in remote fear conditioning 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of suicidal thoughts and behavior in children: results from penalized logistic regression analyses in the ABCD study 93%
- Smoking and the risk for bipolar disorder: causal evidence from a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study 92%
- Causal meditation analysis to understand how different components of a complex psychological intervention improved symptoms (or not) of depression in Goa, India 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting remission after internet-delivered psychotherapy in patients with depression using machine learning and multi-modal data 93%
- Computational Mechanisms Underlying Multi-Step Planning Deficits in Methamphetamine Use Disorder 91%
- Neurovegetative symptom subtypes in young people with major depressive disorder and their structural brain correlates 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.