Does the punishment fit the crime? Consequences and diagnosis of misspecified detection functions in Bayesian spatial capture-recapture modelling
Dey, S.; Bischof, R.; Dupont, P.; Milleret, C.
Show abstract
O_LISpatial capture-recapture (SCR) is now used widely to estimate wildlife densities. At the core of SCR models lies the detection function, linking individual detection probability to the distance from its latent activity center. The most common function (half-normal) assumes a bivariate normal space use and consequently detection pattern. This is likely an oversimplification and misrepresentation of real-life animal space use patterns, but studies have reported that density estimates are relatively robust to misspecified detection functions. However, information about consequences of such misspecification on space use parameters (e.g. home range area), as well as diagnostic tools to reveal it are lacking. C_LIO_LIWe simulated SCR data under six different detection functions, including the half-normal, to represent a wide range of space use patterns. We then fit three different SCR models, with the three simplest detection functions (half-normal, exponential and half-normal plateau) to each simulated data set. We evaluated the consequences of misspecification in terms of bias, precision and coverage probability of density and home range area estimates. We also calculated Bayesian p-values with respect to different discrepancy metrics to assess whether these can help identify misspecifications of the detection function. C_LIO_LIWe corroborate previous findings that density estimates are robust to misspecifications of the detection function. However, estimates of home range area are prone to bias when the detection function is misspecified. When fitted with the half-normal model, average relative bias of 95% kernel home range area estimates ranged between -25% and 26% depending on the misspecification. In contrast, the half-normal plateau model (an extension of the half-normal) returned average relative bias that ranged between -26% and -4%. Additionally, we found useful heuristic patterns in Bayesian p-values to diagnose the misspecification in detection function. C_LIO_LIOur analytical framework and diagnostic tools may help users select a detection function when analyzing empirical data, especially when space use parameters (such as home range area) are of interest. We urge development of additional custom goodness of fit diagnostics for Bayesian SCR models to help practitioners identify a wider range of model misspecifications. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multistate Ornstein-Uhlenbeck approach for practical estimation of movement and resource selection around central places 97%
- Accounting for unobserved spatial variation in step selection analyses of animal movement via spatial random effects 96%
- Home range spillover in habitats with impassable boundaries: Causes, biases, and corrections using autocorrelated kernel density estimation 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting fine-scale distributions and emergent spatiotemporal patterns from temporally dynamic step selection simulations 95%
- Testing the ability of species distribution models to infer variable importance 94%
- Inferring wildlife poaching in Southeast Asia with multispecies dynamic site-occupancy models 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can overlooking "invisible landscapes" bias habitat selection estimation and population distribution projections? 94%
- Failure to meet the exchangeability assumption in Bayesian multispecies occupancy models: Implications for study design 93%
- A machine learning method for estimating the probability of presence using presence-background data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating abundance with interruptions in data collection using open population spatial capture-recapture models 95%
- Choosing priors in Bayesian ecological models by simulating from the prior predictive distribution 95%
- Using visual encounter data to improve capture-recapture abundance estimates 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.