Back

Cutibacterium acnes clonal complexes display various growth rates in blood culture bottles used for diagnosing orthopedic device related infections

El Sayed, F.; Camernik, P.; Roux, A.-L.; Papst, L.; bauer, t.; Nkam, L.; Sivadon-Tardy, V.; Noussair, L.; Herrmann, J.-L.; Gaillard, J.-L.; Jeverica, S.; Rottman, M.

2021-01-14 microbiology
10.1101/2021.01.11.426311 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Blood-culture bottles (BCBs) are widely used to improve the diagnosis of orthopedic device-related infections. Data is scarce on the growth of Cutibacterium acnes and its genotypes in BCBs under real-life clinical conditions. We studied 39 cases of revision arthroplasty for which at least one intraoperative sample yielded a pure C. acnes culture from anaerobic BCBs (BD Bactec Lytic/10 Anaerobic/F [Lytic Ana]) and/or solid media. Genotyping of C. acnes isolates from the 39 cases allowed: i) the identification of 49 non-redundant isolates belonging to four clonal complexes (CCs): CC18, CC28, CC36, and CC53 and ii) the determination of infectant and contaminant strains. Under real-life clinical conditions, Lytic Ana alone was more often positive for contaminants than infectant strains (18/36 [50%] versus 2/13 [15.4%]; p = 0.047). The time to detection (TTD) values in Lytic Ana were shorter for CC53 than other CCs (mean [SD] TTD: 77 [15] versus 165 [71] hours; p = 0.02). CC53 was confirmed to grow faster than other CCs by studying an enlarged panel of 70 genotyped C. acnes strains inoculated in vitro into Lytic Ana vials (mean [SD] TTD: 73 [13] versus 122 [50] hours; p < 0.001). The use of Lytic Ana BCBs in orthopedics increases the recovery rate of C. acnes but leads to the isolation of proportionally more contaminants than true infectant strains. TTD values are much shorter for CC53 strains, irrespective of their being infectant or contaminant. TTD does not solely reflect the bacterial load of samples but also clonal complex-related traits.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.3%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.3%
4
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
5
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
6
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
7
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
8
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
10
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
12
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
14
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
15
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
16
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Biofilm
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
19
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
21
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
22
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
23
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
27
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
28
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
29
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
30
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%