Back

Hydroxyapatite pellets as versatile model surfaces for systematic studies on enamel

Mischo, J.; Faidt, T.; McMillan, R. B.; Dudek, J.; Gunaratnam, G.; Bayenat, P.; Holtsch, A.; Spengler, C.; Mueller, F.; Haehl, H.; Bischoff, M.; Hannig, M.; Jacobs, K.

2021-01-11 biophysics
10.1101/2021.01.11.426207 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Research into materials for medical application draws inspiration from naturally occurring or synthesized surfaces, just like many other research directions. For medical application of materials, particular attention has to be paid to biocompatibility, osseointegration and bacterial adhesion behavior. To understand their properties and behavior, experimental studies with natural materials such as teeth are strongly required. The results, however, may be highly case-dependent because natural surfaces have the disadvantage of being subject to wide variations, for instance in their chemical composition, structure, morphology, roughness, and porosity. A synthetic surface which mimics enamel in its performance with respect to bacterial adhesion and biocompatibility would, therefore, facilitate systematic studies much better. In this study, we discuss the possibility of using hydroxyapatite (HAp) pellets to simulate the surfaces of teeth and show the possibility and limitations of using a model surface. We performed single-cell force spectroscopy with single Staphylococcus aureus cells to measure adhesion-related parameters such as adhesion force and rupture length of adhesins binding to HAp and enamel. We also examine the influence of blood plasma and saliva on the adhesion properties of S. aureus. The results of these measurements are matched to water wettability, elemental composition of the samples and the change in the macromolecules adsorbed over time. We found that the adhesion properties of S. aureus were similar on both samples under all conditions: Significant decreases in adhesion strength were found equally in the presence of saliva or blood plasma on both surfaces. We therefore conclude that HAp pellets are a good alternative for natural dental material. This is especially true when slight variations in the physicochemical properties of the natural materials may affect the experimental series.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.5%
3
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.6%
4
ACS Applied Bio Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
5
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
7
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.4%
9
Nanoscale
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
10
Materials Today Bio
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
11
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
13
Biomaterials Advances
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.2%
15
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
17
ChemBioChem
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Biofilm
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Journal of Dental Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
Life
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
24
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.9%
25
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Lab on a Chip
96 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
27
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
28
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
29
Advanced Functional Materials
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%