Cancer risk and sexual conflict as constraints to body size evolution
Erten, E. Y.; Kokko, H.
Show abstract
Selection often favours large bodies, visible as Copes rule over macroevolutionary time -- but size increases are not inevitable. One understudied cost of large bodies is the high number of cell divisions and the associated risk of oncogenic mutations. Our elasticity analysis shows that selection against a proportional increase in size becomes ever more intense with increasing body size if cancer is the sole selective agent. Thus cancer potentially halts body size increases even if no other constraint does so. We then provide multicellular realism with potentially sexually dimorphic body sizes and traits that control cell populations from zygote to maturity and beyond (ontogenetic management). This shows sexual conflict to extend to ontogeny; sexual dimorphism in mortalities and other life history measures may evolve even in the absence of any ecological causes underlying size- or sex-dependent mortality. Coadaptation of ontogenetic management and body size is required for substantial increases in size.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Which cues are sexy? The evolution of mate preference in sympatric species reveals the contrasted effect of adaptation and reproductive interference. 96%
- Divergent evolution of genetic sex determination mechanisms along environmental gradients 96%
- Hybridization enables the fixation of selfish queen genotypes in eusocial colonies 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.