Back

Moving patronin foci and growing microtubule plus ends direct the spatiotemporal dynamics of Rho signaling and myosin during apical constriction

Guru, A.; Saravanan, S.; Sharma, D.; Narasimha, M.

2021-01-08 cell biology
10.1101/2021.01.08.425813 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The contraction of the amnioserosa by apical constriction provides the major force for Drosophila dorsal closure. The nucleation, movement and dispersal of apicomedial actomyosin complexes generate pulsed constrictions during early dorsal closure whereas persistent apicomedial and circumapical actomyosin complexes drive the unpulsed constrictions that follow. What governs the spatiotemporal assembly of these distinct complexes, endows them with their pulsatile dynamics, and directs their motility remains unresolved. Here we identify an essential role for microtubule growth in regulating the timely contraction of the amnioserosa. We show that a symmetric cage of apical microtubules forms around the coalescing apicomedial myosin complex. An asymmetric tail of microtubules then trails the moving myosin complex and disperses as the myosin complex dissolves. Perturbing microtubule growth reduced the coalescence and movement of apicomedial myosin complexes and redistributed myosin and its activator, Rho kinase to the circumapical pool and altered the cell constriction and tissue contraction dynamics of the amnioserosa. We show that RhoGEF2, the activator of the Rho1 GTPase, is transiently associated with microtubule plus end binding protein EB1 and the apicomedial actomyosin complex. Our results suggest that microtubule growth from moving patronin platforms modulates actomyosin contractility through the spatiotemporal regulation of Rho1 activity. We propose that microtubule reorganisation enables a self-organising, mechanosensitive feedback loop that buffers the tissue against mechanical stresses by modulating actomyosin contractility.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.