Z4-11Al mediates olfactory attraction and courtship in Drosophila melanogaster
Borrero-Echeverry, F.; Solum, M.; Trona, F.; Wallin, E. A.; Bengtsson, M.; Witzgall, P.; Lebreton, S.
Show abstract
Specific mate communication and recognition underlies reproduction and hence speciation. Mate communication evolves during adaptation to ecological niches and makes use of social signals and habitat cues. Our study provides new insights in Drosophila melanogaster premating olfactory communication, showing that female pheromone (Z)-4-undecenal (Z4-11Al) and male pheromone cVA interact with food odour in a sex-specific manner. Furthermore, Z4-11Al, which mediates upwind flight attraction in both sexes, also elicits courtship in experienced males. Twin variants of the olfactory receptor Or69a are co-expressed in the same olfactory sensory neurons, and feed into the same glomerulus in the antennal lobe. Z4-11Al is perceived via Or69aB, while the food odorant (R)-linalool is a main ligand for the other variant, Or69aA. That Z4-11Al mediates courtship in experienced males, not (R)- linalool, is probably due to courtship learning. Behavioural discrimination is reflected by calcium imaging of the antennal lobe, showing distinct glomerular activation patterns by these two compounds. Male sex pheromone cVA is known to affect male and female courtship at close range, but does not elicit upwind flight attraction as a single compound, in to contrast to Z4-11Al. A blend of cVA and the food odour vinegar attracted females, while a blend of female pheromone Z4-11Al and vinegar attracted males instead. Sex-specific upwind flight attraction to blends of food volatiles and male and female pheromone, respectively, adds a new element to Drosophila olfactory premating communication and is an unambiguous paradigm for identifying the behaviourally active components, towards a more complete concept of food-pheromone odour objects. SummaryThe female-produced, species-specific volatile pheromone of D. melanogaster attracts both sexes from a distance, alone and in concert with food odorants, and elicits courtship in experienced males.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Behavior choices amongst grooming, feeding, and courting in Drosophila show contextual flexibility, not an absolute hierarchy of needs 95%
- Optogenetically induced reward and 'frustration' memory in larval Drosophila 95%
- Social foraging extends associative odor-food memory expression in an automated learning assay for Drosophila melanogaster 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The neuropeptide sulfakinin is a peripheral regulator of insect behavioral switch between mating and foraging 95%
- Ir56d-dependent fatty acid responses in Drosophila uncovers taste discrimination between different classes of fatty acids 95%
- Auxin Exposure Disrupts Feeding Behavior and Fatty Acid Metabolism in Adult Drosophila 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neuronal perception of the social environment intergenerationally controls germline development and generation time in C. elegans 93%
- The conserved endocannabinoid anandamide modulates olfactory sensitivity to induce hedonic feeding in C. elegans 93%
- Sites of Circadian Clock Neuron Plasticity Mediate Sensory Integration and Entrainment. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Activity and stress during a critical period regulate olfactory sensory neuron differentiation 95%
- Modulation of fatty acid elongation sustains sexually dimorphic hydrocarbons and female attractiveness in Blattella germanica (L.) 95%
- Fungi activate Toll-1 dependent immune evasion to induce cell loss in the host brain 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The human odorant receptor OR10A6 is tuned to the pheromone of the commensal fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster 98%
- Entirely synthetic memory inception via dual optogenetic activation of sensory and dopaminergic neurons 96%
- Sensory adaptation modulates coding and perceptual quality of odor mixtures 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.