Back

Low STING expression in a transplantable KrasG12D/P53ko lung cancer model contributes to SiglecF+ neutrophil and CD103+Treg accumulation in tumors

Gros, L.; URCINO, C.; Constanzo, J.; Zangger, N.; Meylan, E.; Bonnefoy, N.; Faget, j.

2021-01-04 cancer biology
10.1101/2021.01.04.425311 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of mortality by cancer worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer is the most common type of lung cancer and mutations in the KRAS gene are frequently found in this pathology. While immune checkpoint inhibitors are providing new hope for lung cancer care, only a subset of patients show durable benefit from these new therapies designed to drive an efficient anti-tumor immune response. Hence, it is crucial to better understand the mechanisms through which the tumor immune microenvironment is established in lung tumors. Using bioinformatics, we observed that high expression of the STimulator of INterferon Gene (STING) associates with a longer overall survival specifically in KRAS mutant cancer patients. In lung cancer cell lines, STING expression is linked to interferon response and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Because STING activation in immune cells of the tumor microenvironment using specific agonists is an emerging strategy to trigger an anti-tumor immune response, we took advantage of two transplantable models of Kras driven lung cancer, expressing high or low levels of STING, to investigate the function of STING directly in cancer cells in vivo. We observed that high-STING expression and constitutive STING signaling were critical for transplanted tumor formation rather than playing a major role in tumor immunogenicity. Besides, low-STING expression in cancer cells is associated with an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment characterized by the accumulation of tumor promoting SiglecF+ neutrophils and CD103+ regulatory T cells. In that model, knocking out STING increased the early response to anti-PD1 treatment. We conclude that low-STING expression in cancer cells might confer them an independence from pro-inflammatory signals and a greater immunosuppressive capability and aggressiveness.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.1%
2
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.4%
4
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
7
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 30%
2.9%
9
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
Cell Death Discovery
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
12
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.9%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
14
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
15
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Translational Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
21
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
22
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
23
Cell Communication and Signaling
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
24
Oncotarget
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
25
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
26
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
27
Cancer Immunology Research
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
28
Molecular Cancer Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
29
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
30
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%