Back

IL-2 and IFN- are biomarkers of SARS-CoV-2 specific cellular response in whole blood stimulation assays

Perez-Cabezas, B.; Ribeiro, R.; Costa, I.; Esteves, S.; Teixeira, A. R.; Reis, T.; Monteiro, R.; Afonso, A.; Pinheiro, V.; Antunes, M. I.; Araujo, M. L.; Ribeiro, J. N.; Cordeiro-da-Silva, A.; Santarem, N.; Tavares, J.

2021-01-08 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.01.04.20248897 medRxiv
Show abstract

A proper description of the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 will be critical for the assessment of protection elicited after both infection and vaccination. Uncoupled T and B cell responses have been described in acute and convalescent patients and exposed individuals. We assessed the potential usefulness of whole blood stimulation assays to identify functional cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2. Blood from COVID-19 recovered individuals (5 months after infection) and negative subjects was stimulated for 24 hours with HLA predicted peptide "megapools" of the Spike and Nucleoprotein, or the mixture of them. After stimulation, cytokines were quantified using a beads-based multiplex assay. Interleukin-2 and IFN-{gamma} were found to be specific biomarkers of SARS-CoV-2 cellular response. Using the Spike and Nucleoprotein mixture, 91.3% of COVID-19 recovered individuals presented an IL-2 stimulation index over the cut-off, while 82.6% showed IFN-{gamma}. All the negative individuals presented an IL-2 response under the cut-off, while 5.3% of these subjects presented positive IFN-{gamma} stimulation indexes. Moreover, IL-2 production correlated with IgG levels for Spike 1, RBD, and Nucleocapsid. In conclusion, we demonstrate the potential of whole blood stimulation assays and the quantification of IL-2 and IFN-{gamma} for the analysis of SARS-CoV-2 functional cellular responses.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.9%
2
Journal of Immunological Methods
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
European Journal of Immunology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
7
The Journal of Immunology
146 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
8
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
9
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
15
Clinical & Translational Immunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
16
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
17
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
20
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
22
Journal of Leukocyte Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
24
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%