Back

The Impact of the November 2020 English National Lockdown on COVID-19 case counts

Hunter, P. R.; Brainard, J. S.; Grant, A. R.

2021-01-04 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.01.03.21249169 medRxiv
Show abstract

In the UK the epidemic of COVID-19 continues to pose a significant threat to public health. On the 14th October the English government introduced a tier system for control of the epidemic but just 3 weeks later a National lockdown across all areas of England was implemented. When English areas emerged from Lockdown many were placed in different tiers (most typically moved up at least one tier). However, the effectiveness of the tier system has been challenged by the emergence of a new variant of SARS-CoV-2 which appears to be much more infectious. In addition, from early November a trial mass testing service was being run in Liverpool. We used publicly available data of daily cases by local authority (local government areas) and estimated the reproductive rate (R value) of the epidemic based on 7-day case numbers compared with the previous 7-day period. There was a clear surge in infections from a few days before to several days after the lockdown was implemented. But this surge was almost exclusively associated with Tier 1 and Tier 2 authorities. In Tier 3 authorities where hospitality venues were only allowed to operate as restaurants there was no such surge. After this initial surge, cases declined in all three tiers with the R value dropping to a mean of about 0.7 independent of tier. London, The South East and East of England Regions saw rising infection rates in the last week or so of lockdown primarily in children of secondary school age. We could find no obvious benefit of the trial mass screening programme in Liverpool city. We conclude that in Tiers 1 and 2 much of the beneficial impact of the national lockdown was lost probably because of the leak of its likely implementation five days early leading to increased socialising in these areas before the start of lockdown. We further conclude that given that the new variant is estimated to have an R value of between 0.39 and 0.93 greater than previous variants, any lockdown as strict as the November one would be insufficient to reverse the increase in infections by itself. The value of city-wide mass testing to control the epidemic remains uncertain.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.1%
3
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
4
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.7%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.9%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.8%
8
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
9
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.0%
10
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
11
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
12
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.4%
14
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
16
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%