Mining underutilized whole-genome sequencing projects to improve 16S rRNA databases
Nolan, B.; Abram, F.; Brennan, F.; Holmes, A.; O'Flaherty, V.; Pritchard, L.; Waters, N. R.
Show abstract
Current approaches to interpreting 16S rDNA amplicon data are hampered by several factors. Among these are database inaccuracy or incompleteness, sequencing error, and biased DNA/RNA extraction. Existing 16S rRNA databases source the majority of sequences from deposited amplicon sequences, draft genomes, and complete genomes. Most of the draft genomes available are assembled from short reads. However, repeated ribosomal regions are notoriously difficult to assemble well from short reads, and as a consequence the short-read-assembled 16S rDNA region may be an amalgamation of different loci within the genome. This complicates high-resolution community analysis, as a draft genomes 16S rDNA sequence may be a chimera of multiple loci; in such cases, the draft-derived sequences in a database may not represent a 16S rRNA sequence as it occurs in biology. We present Focus16, a pipeline for improving 16S rRNA databases by mining NCBIs Sequence Read Archive for whole-genome sequencing runs that could be reassembled to yield additional 16S rRNA sequences. Using riboSeed (a genome assembly tool for correcting rDNA misassembly), Focus16 provides a way to augment 16S rRNA databases with high-quality re-assembled sequences. In this study, we augmented the widely-used SILVA 16S rRNA database with the novel sequences disclosed by Focus16 and re-processed amplicon sequences from several benchmarking datasets with DADA2. Using this augmented SILVA database increased the number of amplicon sequence variants that could be assigned taxonomic annotations. Further, fine-scale classification was improved by revealing ambiguities. We observed, for example, that amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) may be assigned to a specific genus where Focus16-correction would indicate that the ASV is represented in two or more genera. Thus, we demonstrate that improvements can be made to taxonomic classification by incorporating these carefully re-assembled 16S rRNA sequences, and we invite the community to expand our work to augment existing 16S rRNA reference databases such as SILVA, GreenGenes, and RDP.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets 96%
- SQMtools: automated processing and visual analysis of 'omics data with R and anvi'o 95%
- Reverse engineering environmental metatranscriptomes clarifies best practices for eukaryotic assembly 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- PhyloMagnet: Fast and accurate screening of short-read meta-omics data using gene-centric phylogenetics 96%
- mettannotator: a comprehensive and scalable Nextflow annotation pipeline for prokaryotic assemblies 95%
- 3CAC: improving the classification of phages and plasmids in metagenomic assemblies using assembly graphs 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- From defaults to databases: parameter and database choice dramatically impact the performance of metagenomic taxonomic classification tools 96%
- Whokaryote: distinguishing eukaryotic and prokaryotic contigs in metagenomes based on gene structure 96%
- SyFi: generating and using sequence fingerprints to distinguish SynCom isolates 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.