Evidence that pain sensitivity is rhythmic in humans, mainly driven by the endogenous circadian system and little by sleep
Daguet, I.; Raverot, V.; Bouhassira, D.; Gronfier, C.
Show abstract
Pain intensity has been reported to fluctuate during the day in some experimental and clinical conditions, but the mechanisms underlying these fluctuations are unknown. Although the circadian timing system is known to regulate a wide range of physiological functions, its implication in pain regulation is unknown. We show here, using highly controlled laboratory constant routine conditions, that pain sensitivity is rhythmic over the 24-hours and strongly controlled by the endogenous circadian timing system. We find that pain sensitivity follows a sinusoidal circadian rhythmicity, with a maximum in the middle of the night and a minimum in the afternoon. We also find a weak homeostatic control of pain sensitivity, with a linear increase over the 34 hours of prolonged wakefulness, which parallels that of sleep pressure. Using mathematical modelling, we describe that the circadian system accounts for 80% of the full magnitude of pain sensitivity over the 24 hours, and that sleep-related processes account for only 20%. This result reveals that nocturnal analgesia is predominantly induced by the circadian system and has been wrongly attributed only to sleep. Our findings highlight the need to consider the time of day in pain assessment, and suggest that personalized circadian medicine may be a promising approach to pain management. Significance statementWe discovered that sensitivity to pain is rhythmic in healthy humans, that sensitivity is maximal at night and minimal in the afternoon. Contrarily to the current thinking that sleep is the best painkiller, we find that the 24-h rhythmicity of sensitivity to pain is mainly controlled by a biological circadian clock in our body, and very little by our sleep. Our article reveals the neurobiological mechanisms involved in driving the rhythmicity of pain perception in humans, with the main time-piece located in the brain (the suprachiasmatic nuclei in the hypothalamus). Our findings challenge the current vision of pain physiology, and reveal the need to consider time-of-day and internal biological time for pain evaluation and pain management.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Contribution of Circulating Endocannabinoid Tone to Individual Differences in Human Pain Sensitivity: A Quantitative Sensory Testing Study 92%
- Digging deeper into pain - an ethological behavior assay correlating well-being in mice with human pain experience. 92%
- Migraine Disability, Pain Catastrophizing, And Headache Severity Are Associated With Evoked Pain And Targeted By Mind-Body Therapy 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the Effects of Behavioral Circadian Rhythm Disruption in Shift-Working Police Academy Trainees 90%
- The reindeer circadian clock is rhythmic and temperature-compensated but shows evidence of weak coupling between the secondary and core molecular clock loops 90%
- Cell-type specific circadian bioluminescence rhythms in Dbp reporter mice 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experimenter familiarization is a crucial prerequisite for assessing behavioral outcomes and reduces stress in mice not only under chronic pain conditions 92%
- Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Neurons in the Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis Differentially Influence Pain Processing and Modulation in Male and Female Mice 91%
- Neuronal adenosine A2A receptors signal ergogenic effects of caffeine 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Personalized sleep-wake patterns aligned with circadian rhythm relieve daytime sleepiness 92%
- Large cognitive fluctuations surrounding sleep in daily living 91%
- Behavioral and cortical arousal from sleep, muscimol-induced coma, and anesthesia by direct optogenetic stimulation of cortical neurons 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.