Back

Dynamic erasure of X chromosome upregulation during iPSC reprogramming and in the inner cell mass

Chandel, D.; Naik, H.; Gayen, S.

2020-12-24 genetics
10.1101/2020.12.23.424181 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In mammals, sex chromosome dosage is compensated through X-chromosome inactivation and active-X upregulation. It is believed that during early development, X-chromosome inactivation and active X upregulation happen in a highly coordinated fashion. However, such coordination between two X-chromosomes in other developmental contexts remains unexplored. Here, we have profiled the coordination between two X-chromosomes in female cells in different developmental contexts and cell types: pre-implantation embryos, embryonic epiblast cells, iPSC reprogramming, germ cell reprogramming, B-cell, and extra-embryonic endoderm stem (XEN) cells. Interestingly, we found that two X-chromosomes in female cells are not always coordinated; instead, it happens in a lineage-specific manner. Specially, while embryonic mouse epiblast cells, iPSC undergo erasure of X-upregulation upon reactivation of the inactive X, germ cells do not. Importantly, we show that the erasure of X-upregulation in epiblast or iPSC is potentially mediated via undifferentiated embryonic transcription Factor 1 (UTF1), which is absent or lowly expressed in late germ cells and therefore, germ cells are unable to erase upregulation. Moreover, we found that partial reactivation of the inactive X is insufficient to drive the erasure of upregulation globally, nor from their counterparts on the active X in XEN and B-cells. Finally, through a phenomenological mathematical model, we show that cross-inhibition between two X-chromosomes can reproduce the dynamics of reactivation and erasure of upregulation. Altogether, our study provides insight into the coordination between two X-chromosomes in female cells in different developmental contexts and related mechanistic aspects. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=117 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/424181v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (38K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f01b7borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9c586borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@70f8eaorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e5d000_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Published in Stem Cell Reports (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.