Dynamic erasure of X chromosome upregulation during iPSC reprogramming and in the inner cell mass
Chandel, D.; Naik, H.; Gayen, S.
Show abstract
In mammals, sex chromosome dosage is compensated through X-chromosome inactivation and active-X upregulation. It is believed that during early development, X-chromosome inactivation and active X upregulation happen in a highly coordinated fashion. However, such coordination between two X-chromosomes in other developmental contexts remains unexplored. Here, we have profiled the coordination between two X-chromosomes in female cells in different developmental contexts and cell types: pre-implantation embryos, embryonic epiblast cells, iPSC reprogramming, germ cell reprogramming, B-cell, and extra-embryonic endoderm stem (XEN) cells. Interestingly, we found that two X-chromosomes in female cells are not always coordinated; instead, it happens in a lineage-specific manner. Specially, while embryonic mouse epiblast cells, iPSC undergo erasure of X-upregulation upon reactivation of the inactive X, germ cells do not. Importantly, we show that the erasure of X-upregulation in epiblast or iPSC is potentially mediated via undifferentiated embryonic transcription Factor 1 (UTF1), which is absent or lowly expressed in late germ cells and therefore, germ cells are unable to erase upregulation. Moreover, we found that partial reactivation of the inactive X is insufficient to drive the erasure of upregulation globally, nor from their counterparts on the active X in XEN and B-cells. Finally, through a phenomenological mathematical model, we show that cross-inhibition between two X-chromosomes can reproduce the dynamics of reactivation and erasure of upregulation. Altogether, our study provides insight into the coordination between two X-chromosomes in female cells in different developmental contexts and related mechanistic aspects. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=117 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/424181v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (38K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f01b7borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9c586borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@70f8eaorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e5d000_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mcm2 promotes stem cell differentiation via its ability to bind H3-H4 96%
- SMARCAD1 and TOPBP1 contribute to heterochromatin maintenance at the transition from the 2C-like to the pluripotent state 96%
- Single-cell profiling of lncRNAs in human germ cells and molecular analysis reveals transcriptional regulation of LNC1845 on LHX8 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid redistribution and extensive binding of NANOG and GATA6 at shared regulatory elements underlie specification of divergent cell fates 96%
- A Nanog-dependent gene cluster initiates the specification of the pluripotent epiblast 96%
- Temporal constraints on enhancer usage shape the regulation of limb gene transcription 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transient DUX4 expression induces blastomere-like expression program that is marked by SLC34A2 96%
- Genetic and epigenetic determinants of reactivation of Mecp2 and the inactive X chromosome in neural stem cells. 96%
- Single Cell Analysis Reveals Partial Reactivation of X-chromosome Instead of chromosome-wide dampening in Naïve Human Pluripotent Stem Cells 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- TET3 protects the Dlk1-Dio3 Imprinted Locus from DNA hypomethylation during adult NSC Reprogramming 96%
- X upregulation is not global and extent of upregulation differs between ancestral and acquired X-linked genes 96%
- Semi-coordinated allelic-bursting shape dynamic random monoallelic expression in pregastrulationembryos 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The embryonic DNA methylation program modulates the cis-regulatory landscape via CTCF antagonism 96%
- INO80 promotes H2A.Z occupancy to regulate 1 cell fate transition in pluripotent stem cells 96%
- Homeobox transcription factor MNX1 is crucial for restraining the expression of pan-neuronal genes in motor neurons 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.