Back

Multiplexed experimental strategies for fragment library screening using SPR biosensors

FitzGerald, E. A.; Vagrys, D.; Opassi, G.; Klein, H. F.; Hamilton, D. J.; Boronat, P.; Cederfelt, D.; Talibov, V. O.; Abramsson, M.; Moberg, A.; Lindgren, M. T.; Holmgren, C.; Dobritzsch, D.; Davis, B.; O'Brien, P.; Wijtmans, M.; van Muijlwijk-Koezen, J. E.; Hubbard, R. E.; de Esch, I. J. P.; Danielson, U. H.

2020-12-23 biophysics
10.1101/2020.12.23.424167 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Surface plasmon resonance biosensor technology (SPR) is ideally suited for fragment-based lead discovery. However, generally suitable experimental procedures or detailed protocols are lacking, especially for structurally or physico-chemically challenging targets or when tool compounds are lacking. Success depends on accounting for the features of both the target and the chemical library, purposely designing screening experiments for identification and validation of hits with desired specificity and mode-of-action, and availability of orthogonal methods capable of confirming fragment hits. By adopting a multiplexed strategy, the range of targets and libraries amenable to an SPR biosensor-based approach for identifying hits is considerably expanded. We here illustrate innovative strategies using five challenging targets and variants thereof. Two libraries of 90 and 1056 fragments were screened using two different flow-based SPR biosensor systems, allowing different experimental approaches. Practical considerations and procedures accounting for the characteristics of the proteins and libraries, and that increase robustness, sensitivity, throughput and versatility are highlighted.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
2
RSC Chemical Biology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
3
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.3%
5
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
6
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
8
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
9
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 31%
2.7%
12
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
13
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
14
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
15
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.8%
17
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
18
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
19
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
20
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
21
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
22
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
23
Nanoscale Advances
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
24
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
25
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
ChemBioChem
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Chemistry – A European Journal
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%