Back

Identification of key genes and associated pathways in neuroendocrine tumors through bioinformatics analysis and predictions of small drug molecules

Devarbhavi, P.; Vastrad, B. M.; Tengli, A. R.; Vastrad, C. M.; Kotturshetti, I. B.

2020-12-24 bioinformatics
10.1101/2020.12.23.424165 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Neuroendocrine tumor (NET) is one of malignant cancer and is identified with high morbidity and mortality rates around the world. With indigent clinical outcomes, potential biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and drug target are crucial to explore. The aim of this study is to examine the gene expression module of NET and to identify potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers as well as to find out new drug target. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified from GSE65286 dataset was used for pathway enrichment analyses and gene ontology (GO) enrichment analyses and protein - protein interaction (PPI) analysis and module analysis. Moreover, miRNAs and transcription factors (TFs) that regulated the up and down regulated genes were predicted. Furthermore, validation of hub genes was performed. Finally, molecular docking studies were performed. DEGs were identified, including 453 down regulated and 459 up regulated genes. Pathway and GO enrichment analysis revealed that DEGs were enriched in sucrose degradation, creatine biosynthesis, anion transport and modulation of chemical synaptic transmission. Important hub genes and target genes were identified through PPI network, modules, target gene - miRNA network and target gene - TF network. Finally, survival analyses, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and RT-PCR validated the significant difference of ATP1A1, LGALS3, LDHA, SYK, VDR, OBSL1, KRT40, WWOX, NINL and PPP2R2B between metastatic NET and normal controls. In conclusion, the DEGs and hub genes with their regulatory elements identified in this study will help us understand the molecular mechanisms underlying NET and provide candidate targets for future research.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.