Back

Time Perception through the Processing of Verb Tenses: An ERP study regarding Mental Time Travel

Papageorgiou, C.; Giannopoulos, A. E.; Fokas, A. S.; Thompson, P. M.; Kapsalis, N. C.; Papageorgiou, P.; Stachtea, X.; Capsalis, C. N.

2020-12-24 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.12.23.424164 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Humans are equipped with the so-called Mental Time Travel (MTT) ability, which allows them to consciously construct and elaborate past or future scenes. The mechanisms underlying MTT remain elusive. This study focused on the late positive potential (LPP) and alpha oscillations, considering that LPP covaries with the temporal continuity whereas the alpha oscillations index the temporal organization of perception. To that end, subjects were asked to focus on performing two mental functions engaging working memory, which involved mental self-projection into either the present-past (PP) border or the present-future (PF) border. To evaluate underlying mechanisms, the evoked frontal late positive potentials (LPP) as well as their cortical sources were analyzed via the standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) technique. The LPP amplitudes - in the left lateral prefrontal areas that were elicited during PF tasks - were significantly higher than those associated with PP, whereas opposite patterns were observed in the central and right prefrontal areas. Crucially, the LPP activations of both the PP and PF self-projections overlapped with the brains default mode network and related interacting areas. Finally, we found enhanced alpha-related activation with respect to PP in comparison to PF, predominantly over the right hemisphere central brain regions (specifically, the precentral gyrus). These findings confirm that the two types of self-projection, as reflected by the frontally-distributed LPP, share common cortical resources that recruit different brain regions in a balanced way. This balanced distribution of brain activation might signify that biological time tends to behave in a homeostatic way.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
22.3%
2
Brain Topography
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
3
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
4
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.2%
5
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.1%
6
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
8
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
9
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.0%
10
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
11
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
12
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
14
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
15
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.1%
17
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
20
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
21
NeuroImage: Reports
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
22
Brain Research
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%